header-logo header-logo

26 April 2020
Issue: 7884 / Categories: Legal News , Cybercrime , Covid-19 , Profession
printer mail-detail

COVID-19: Cybercriminals attack

Fraudsters are taking advantage of lower levels of security and IT challenges as people work from home during the COVID-19 pandemic, the Law Society and Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned

The lockdown has prompted a surge in scams, cybercrimes and horrific pranks such as Zoom bombers who anonymously join calls then use the sharescreen facility to post disturbing content. The SRA has received specific reports about law firms being targeted, for example, criminals attempted to create a standing order for £4,000 a month from one firm’s client account.

Action Fraud has reported a spike in attacks on smaller businesses, flagging that criminals are sending through emails designed to look like official government coronavirus advice, while the National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC) reported a 400% increase in cyberattacks across all businesses in the country during the first two weeks of lockdown.

The Law Society this week launched a cybersecurity campaign to help solicitors protect clients. It includes revised guidance on preventing frauds and scams, advice on the safe delivery of legal services online, and how to effectively use legal technology during the crisis.

‘Cybercriminals and fraudsters are circling like vultures to exploit any and all vulnerabilities,’ said Simon Davis, Law Society president.

‘It is important we are equipped to protect against these threats. We will be advising on the safe delivery of legal services from home, including the use of video-conferencing platforms such as Zoom.

‘Protecting clients’ data will rightly be a priority for many firms. We have a dedicated in-house team who will be on-hand to provide bespoke support to members, field queries, and facilitate thought leadership.’

The SRA published information at the start of the month advising firms on key cybersecurity issues. See: www.sra.org.uk/sra/news/cyber-security-qa.

It has provided wider information for law firms during the lockdown at: www.sra.org.uk/sra/news/coronavirus-update.

Paul Philip, SRA chief executive, said: ‘Cybercrime is a priority risk for the legal sector and it’s not going away during the Covid-19 pandemic.

The NCSC is also running a Cyber Aware campaign to help keep workers and the public safe. See: www.ncsc.gov.uk/cyberaware.

Issue: 7884 / Categories: Legal News , Cybercrime , Covid-19 , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll