header-logo header-logo

21 April 2020
Issue: 7883 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Profession , Family
printer mail-detail

COVID-19: Keeping the show on the road

Barristers, solicitors, court staff, judiciary, and all those others who support court users have been praised for working ‘around the clock to explore and deliver extraordinary changes at great pace’

Susan Acland-Hood, CEO of HM Courts and Tribunals (HMCTS), in a Bar Council blog, said she was proud of how the legal profession has united to keep the justice system running. Senior judges have made decisions to ensure the most urgent cases are prioritised while continuing less urgent work by other means, she noted, while HMCTS had increased the number of teleconferences it can run using BTMeetMe and videoconferences using Skype for Business.

Looking ahead, Acland-Hood said HMCTS is testing and expanding its use of a fully video hearings system, the ‘cloud video platform’ (CVP), which has been used in certain civil, family and tax tribunal hearings. She said about 85% of cases are using audio and video technology. She added that HMCTS is keen to hear feedback from ‘everyone involved’.

Judges have been instructed to conduct hearings remotely where possible, while the Ministry of Justice has consolidated courts and buildings into fewer buildings to help prevent the spread of COVID-19. Currently, 160 court buildings are open to the public for essential hearings and a further 116 courts are staffed but closed to the public with parties accessing proceedings remotely. The Crown Prosecution Service has instructed prosecutors to prioritise serious cases to manage the impact of the pandemic.

Meanwhile, family lawyers have warned that couples face delays of several months to process divorce petitions, and the situation is likely to get worse.

Divorce is categorised by HMCTS as ‘work that we will do our best to do’. According to Lisa Pepper, partner, Osbornes Law, the latest guidance from Bury St Edmunds Divorce Centre reveals it is processing petitions received seven weeks ago, decree nisi applications are taking 11 weeks and consent orders are taking 13 weeks.

Pepper said: ‘The divorce courts, which were already over stretched are facing a crisis because of the coronavirus pandemic. It is crucial that this problem is addressed to ensure that delays don’t get any worse.’

Issue: 7883 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Profession , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll