header-logo header-logo

COVID-19: Keeping the show on the road

21 April 2020
Issue: 7883 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Profession , Family
printer mail-detail
Barristers, solicitors, court staff, judiciary, and all those others who support court users have been praised for working ‘around the clock to explore and deliver extraordinary changes at great pace’

Susan Acland-Hood, CEO of HM Courts and Tribunals (HMCTS), in a Bar Council blog, said she was proud of how the legal profession has united to keep the justice system running. Senior judges have made decisions to ensure the most urgent cases are prioritised while continuing less urgent work by other means, she noted, while HMCTS had increased the number of teleconferences it can run using BTMeetMe and videoconferences using Skype for Business.

Looking ahead, Acland-Hood said HMCTS is testing and expanding its use of a fully video hearings system, the ‘cloud video platform’ (CVP), which has been used in certain civil, family and tax tribunal hearings. She said about 85% of cases are using audio and video technology. She added that HMCTS is keen to hear feedback from ‘everyone involved’.

Judges have been instructed to conduct hearings remotely where possible, while the Ministry of Justice has consolidated courts and buildings into fewer buildings to help prevent the spread of COVID-19. Currently, 160 court buildings are open to the public for essential hearings and a further 116 courts are staffed but closed to the public with parties accessing proceedings remotely. The Crown Prosecution Service has instructed prosecutors to prioritise serious cases to manage the impact of the pandemic.

Meanwhile, family lawyers have warned that couples face delays of several months to process divorce petitions, and the situation is likely to get worse.

Divorce is categorised by HMCTS as ‘work that we will do our best to do’. According to Lisa Pepper, partner, Osbornes Law, the latest guidance from Bury St Edmunds Divorce Centre reveals it is processing petitions received seven weeks ago, decree nisi applications are taking 11 weeks and consent orders are taking 13 weeks.

Pepper said: ‘The divorce courts, which were already over stretched are facing a crisis because of the coronavirus pandemic. It is crucial that this problem is addressed to ensure that delays don’t get any worse.’

Issue: 7883 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Profession , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll