header-logo header-logo

COVID-19: Keeping the show on the road

21 April 2020
Issue: 7883 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Profession , Family
printer mail-detail
Barristers, solicitors, court staff, judiciary, and all those others who support court users have been praised for working ‘around the clock to explore and deliver extraordinary changes at great pace’

Susan Acland-Hood, CEO of HM Courts and Tribunals (HMCTS), in a Bar Council blog, said she was proud of how the legal profession has united to keep the justice system running. Senior judges have made decisions to ensure the most urgent cases are prioritised while continuing less urgent work by other means, she noted, while HMCTS had increased the number of teleconferences it can run using BTMeetMe and videoconferences using Skype for Business.

Looking ahead, Acland-Hood said HMCTS is testing and expanding its use of a fully video hearings system, the ‘cloud video platform’ (CVP), which has been used in certain civil, family and tax tribunal hearings. She said about 85% of cases are using audio and video technology. She added that HMCTS is keen to hear feedback from ‘everyone involved’.

Judges have been instructed to conduct hearings remotely where possible, while the Ministry of Justice has consolidated courts and buildings into fewer buildings to help prevent the spread of COVID-19. Currently, 160 court buildings are open to the public for essential hearings and a further 116 courts are staffed but closed to the public with parties accessing proceedings remotely. The Crown Prosecution Service has instructed prosecutors to prioritise serious cases to manage the impact of the pandemic.

Meanwhile, family lawyers have warned that couples face delays of several months to process divorce petitions, and the situation is likely to get worse.

Divorce is categorised by HMCTS as ‘work that we will do our best to do’. According to Lisa Pepper, partner, Osbornes Law, the latest guidance from Bury St Edmunds Divorce Centre reveals it is processing petitions received seven weeks ago, decree nisi applications are taking 11 weeks and consent orders are taking 13 weeks.

Pepper said: ‘The divorce courts, which were already over stretched are facing a crisis because of the coronavirus pandemic. It is crucial that this problem is addressed to ensure that delays don’t get any worse.’

Issue: 7883 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Profession , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll