header-logo header-logo

At cross purposes?

26 May 2011 / Emily Lew , David Phillips
Issue: 7467 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Mediation
printer mail-detail

David Phillips & Emily Lew discuss the merits & limitations of the EU Mediation Directive

The EU Directive on mediation in civil and commercial matters was adopted by the European Parliament on 23 April 2008. The Directive applies only to European cross-border disputes, rather than to disputes within any one member state and covers five broad areas. These are:

(1) encouragement by member states of mediator training and the development and adherence to a voluntary code of conduct;

(2) judicial powers to invite parties
to mediate;

(3) obligations on member states to ensure mediation settlement agreements are enforceable as if they are court judgments (should all parties consent);

(4) confidentiality of mediations such that submissions made during a mediation cannot be used in subsequent judicial proceedings if the mediation fails; and

(5) the suspension of limitation periods while parties mediate.

EU member states (except Denmark, which has opted out) had until 21 May 2011 to implement the new rules into national law. Estonia, France, Italy and Portugal have already notified the Commission that they have implemented

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll