header-logo header-logo

Cyber fraud: a question of trust

24 November 2017
Issue: 7771 / Categories: Features , Data protection , Criminal
printer mail-detail
nlj_7771_barclay

Robin Barclay explains why the cyber fraud landscape is on par with the Libor & Forex scandals

Cyber fraud is without doubt the biggest commercial and legal threat now facing businesses and individuals around the world. Attacks are typically carried out in four ways: (i) the corruption or coercion of staff (inside jobs); (ii) the use of malware to hijack a corporate computer network; (iii) the hijacking of computer systems used by third party suppliers; and (iv) ‘phishing’ scams. The risk is interdependent, local and cross-border, commercial, financial and personal to virtually each one of us. Adequate and effective corporate governance and risk management arrangements are thus paramount. This article explores the intersection of English criminal, regulatory and civil liabilities and remedies in connection with cyber fraud and how cyber attacks will inevitably generate financial penalties and litigation matching those of the global Libor and Forex scandals.

Differentiating cyber crime from cyber fraud

Cyber crime is any crime which involves the use and misuse of computers or computer technology. Cyberfraud is specific to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll