header-logo header-logo

03 February 2012 / Malcolm Dowden , Jen Hawkins
Issue: 7499 / Categories: Features , Media , Environment , Property , Technology
printer mail-detail

The digital divide

Should the community infrastructure levy fund superfast broadband, ask Malcolm Dowden & Jen Hawkins

As more local authorities adopt the community infrastructure levy (CIL) as part of their planning gain regime there are sharply diverging opinions on its use to fund the roll out of superfast broadband. These differences reflect the related difficulties of interpreting the legislation and of applying it to the particular economic conditions and aspirations of each area. Broadband provision may be a legitimate element of CIL in areas shown to be on the wrong side of the “digital divide”, but not in areas with sufficient existing or prospective commercial provision. The local authority’s decision must be based on robust evidence to avoid the risk of challenge.

CIL is a financial charge which local planning authorities are entitled (but not obliged) to charge on development in their area. The money raised is to be spent on local infrastructure. It replaces s 106 agreements as a means of capturing some of the land value released from planning permissions.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll