header-logo header-logo

03 February 2012 / Malcolm Dowden , Jen Hawkins
Issue: 7499 / Categories: Features , Media , Environment , Property , Technology
printer mail-detail

The digital divide

Should the community infrastructure levy fund superfast broadband, ask Malcolm Dowden & Jen Hawkins

As more local authorities adopt the community infrastructure levy (CIL) as part of their planning gain regime there are sharply diverging opinions on its use to fund the roll out of superfast broadband. These differences reflect the related difficulties of interpreting the legislation and of applying it to the particular economic conditions and aspirations of each area. Broadband provision may be a legitimate element of CIL in areas shown to be on the wrong side of the “digital divide”, but not in areas with sufficient existing or prospective commercial provision. The local authority’s decision must be based on robust evidence to avoid the risk of challenge.

CIL is a financial charge which local planning authorities are entitled (but not obliged) to charge on development in their area. The money raised is to be spent on local infrastructure. It replaces s 106 agreements as a means of capturing some of the land value released from planning permissions.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll