header-logo header-logo

Dodgeball

29 May 2015 / Martin Burns
Issue: 7654 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Profession , ADR
printer mail-detail

Don’t resolve disputes, avoid them, says Martin Burns

Transport for London (TfL) and the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS) have developed a practical conflict avoidance and early intervention procedure for construction and engineering contracts, which is designed to save money and preserve commercial relationships.

Disputes on major construction and engineering projects can cause immense harm to long term relations between employers and contractors.

Resolving a dispute is more difficult when a difference of opinion between an employer and contractor is not addressed early. In such circumstances parties frequently descend into the trenches. Their views become rigid and, in many cases, parties become so manifestly inflexible that meaningful dialogue is almost impossible.

Traditional methods for resolving disputes can be very expensive and inordinately slow. The commercial and human consequences of litigation, arbitration and adjudication can often be intolerable. This is usually the case even when parties manage to settle their differences before a judgment; award or decision has been given on a dispute.

Avoidance v resolution

In respect of major infrastructure projects, particularly those which

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll