header-logo header-logo

01 August 2019 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 7851 / Categories: Features , Public , Constitutional law , Brexit
printer mail-detail

Electioneering & misconduct in public office

Nicholas Dobson reflects on how & why the recent private prosecution against Boris Johnson failed

  • The district judge erred in issuing a summons against Boris Johnson for misconduct in public office for campaigning statements made before the June 2016 EU Referendum.

Elections invariably invoke strong passions as well as a rather creative approach to electioneering. So when a defeated challenger once accused former Nicaraguan dictator Anastasio Somoza of ballot-rigging he was told that ‘You won the elections, but I won the count’.

In the UK passions certainly ran high before the EU referendum on 23 June 2016. Boris Johnson’s controversial ‘Vote Leave’ bus advert: ‘We send the EU £350m a week, let’s fund our NHS instead’, attracted widespread and impassioned outrage, particularly among Remain advocates. On the other side, the government leaflet circulated at public expense to every UK household warned that: ‘If the UK voted to leave the EU, the resulting economic shock would put pressure on the value of the pound, which would risk higher prices

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll