header-logo header-logo

Electioneering & misconduct in public office

01 August 2019 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 7851 / Categories: Features , Public , Constitutional law , Brexit
printer mail-detail

Nicholas Dobson reflects on how & why the recent private prosecution against Boris Johnson failed

  • The district judge erred in issuing a summons against Boris Johnson for misconduct in public office for campaigning statements made before the June 2016 EU Referendum.

Elections invariably invoke strong passions as well as a rather creative approach to electioneering. So when a defeated challenger once accused former Nicaraguan dictator Anastasio Somoza of ballot-rigging he was told that ‘You won the elections, but I won the count’.

In the UK passions certainly ran high before the EU referendum on 23 June 2016. Boris Johnson’s controversial ‘Vote Leave’ bus advert: ‘We send the EU £350m a week, let’s fund our NHS instead’, attracted widespread and impassioned outrage, particularly among Remain advocates. On the other side, the government leaflet circulated at public expense to every UK household warned that: ‘If the UK voted to leave the EU, the resulting economic shock would put pressure on the value of the pound, which would risk higher prices

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll