header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

Employment law: a chance for change? (Pt 2)

© Copyright LexisNexis 2025. All Rights Reserved.
03 March 2023 / Simon Fennell
Issue: 8015 / Categories: Features , Employment , EU , Brexit
printer mail-detail
113332
Eyeing up further opportunities for improvements to employment law following the revocation of retained EU law, Simon Fennell targets the Working Time Regulations & Agency Workers Regulations
  • UK employers could benefit from changes to the Working Time Regulations 1998, including re-examining limits around the 48-hour working week, annual leave and pay, and general holiday.
  • The Agency Workers Regulations 2010 could potentially be removed from UK law altogether.

In the second part in this series, we take a look at the possible changes that could be made to improve the Working Time Regulations 1998, SI 1998/1833 (WTR 1998) and the Agency Workers Regulations 2010, SI 2010/93 (AWR 2010), following the sunsetting of retained EU legislation under the Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill. Part 1 considered the limitations and challenges of the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006, SI 2006/246 (TUPE), and the potential for improvements to be made (see ‘Employment law: a chance for change? (Pt 1)’, NLJ, 17 February 2023,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Motor finance faces £11bn reckoning
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
NLJ this week: Gold on Awaab’s Law & digital divorce
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
NLJ this week: AI in the dock—courts need literacy, not fear
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Landlords lose their upward climb
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
NLJ this week: Privy Council undresses the ‘shareholder rule’
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll