header-logo header-logo

10 June 2020 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7890 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employment law brief: 10 June 2020

22337
Ian Smith takes a gander at short, precise, but nonetheless important aspects of both common & statutory law
  • Wrongful or unfair?
  • Status of the proverbial last straw.
  • Re-engagement not an ‘order’.
  • TUPE-related changes void, even if to the employee’s advantage.
  • When does a new employee start work?

Unlike some recent Briefs which have covered cases concerning broad issues of principle or policy (eg the recent Supreme Court cases reassessing vicarious liability), this month’s Brief looks at five cases concerning short, precise but important aspects of both common law and statutory law in the employment context, namely the difference between wrongful and unfair dismissal, ‘last straw’ constructive dismissal, the limitations of an ‘order’ for re-engagement, TUPE-related changes to employment contracts and the start date for new employment.

Wrongful or unfair?

East Coast Main Line Co Ltd v Cameron UKEAT/0212/19 is a good case example of the difference between wrongful dismissal and unfair dismissal and the importance of keeping them separate for most purposes. The claimant was summarily

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll