header-logo header-logo

13 March 2026 / Ian Smith
Issue: 8153 / Categories: Features , Employment , Tribunals , Disciplinary&grievance procedures
printer mail-detail

Employment law brief: 13 March 2026

244394
Old caselaw gets a modern makeover: Ian Smith runs through secondment arrangements, multiple reasons for dismissal, & an appeal unlike any other
  • Recent decisions have highlighted that a change of employer during secondment will be rare without clear contractual novation; collective disciplinary procedures can be contractually incorporated where wording and context support it; and tribunals must identify the employer’s actual principal reason for dismissal, not a reason that could have justified it.
  • On procedural fairness, the Employment Appeal Tribunal reaffirmed that serious defects in handling an appeal can by themselves render a dismissal unfair, even if the outcome might ultimately have been the same.

The four cases considered here are all examples of longstanding issues in individual employment law. Much of the case authority in these areas is quite old, having had the basic rules established years ago, but it is instructive to see some modern instances and the exploration of some detailed points. Also, some of these judgments have made interesting side points. The cases cover

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ward Hadaway—19 promotions

Ward Hadaway—19 promotions

19 promotions across national offices, including two new partners

Brabners—Ruth Hargreaves

Brabners—Ruth Hargreaves

Partner promoted to head of corporate team

Slater Heelis—Liam Hall, Jordan Bear & Joe Madigan

Slater Heelis—Liam Hall, Jordan Bear & Joe Madigan

Chester office expansion accelerates with triple appointment

NEWS
As AI chatbots increasingly provide legal and commercial advice, English law is beginning to confront who should bear responsibility when automated systems get things wrong
Businesses are facing a ‘dramatic rise in prosecution risks’ as sweeping reforms to corporate criminal liability come into force, expanding the net of who can be held responsible for wrongdoing inside organisations
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has reignited debate over what exactly counts as the ‘conduct of litigation’ in modern legal practice
A controversial High Court financial remedies ruling has reignited debate over secrecy, non-disclosure and fairness in divorce proceedings involving hidden wealth
Britain’s deferred prosecution agreement regime is undergoing a significant shift, with prosecutors placing renewed emphasis on corporate cooperation, reform and early self-reporting
back-to-top-scroll