header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
11 November 2020 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7910 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employment law brief: 13 November 2020

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
31566
After a quiet few weeks, Ian Smith breaks the silence & tackles a Polkey reduction & the meaning of ‘because of’...

In brief

  • Constructive dismissal; communicating by conduct.
  • ACAS uplift not applicable to whistleblowing cases.
  • Applying a Polkey reduction to loss of statutory rights.
  • Causation in discrimination cases—the meaning of ‘because of’.

Things on the employment law front have been rather quiet for the last few weeks. At the time of writing we are still awaiting the publication of two Supreme Court decisions (already heard) of major importance, namely in the Uber litigation on employment/worker status in gig economy cases and the Royal Mencap case which will hopefully square the circle on when the national minimum wage applies to on-call/living in carers. Both have economic implications beyond their purely legal significance. In the meantime, we have had three EAT cases reported last month on communicating acceptance of employer repudiation by conduct, applying a Polkey (Polkey v A E Dayton Services Ltd [1987] 3 All ER 974)

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

Sidley—Jeremy Trinder

Sidley—Jeremy Trinder

Global finance group strengthened by returning partner in London

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Driving test fraudsters steer towards jail
Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
NLJ this week: Deepfakes demand data law muscle
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
NLJ this week: 40% penalty for coercive control
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
NLJ this week: Mbappé row spotlights ‘ethics bonuses’
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
NLJ this week: CPR tweak closes third-party disclosure gap
A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll