header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
11 November 2020 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7910 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employment law brief: 13 November 2020

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
31566
After a quiet few weeks, Ian Smith breaks the silence & tackles a Polkey reduction & the meaning of ‘because of’...

In brief

  • Constructive dismissal; communicating by conduct.
  • ACAS uplift not applicable to whistleblowing cases.
  • Applying a Polkey reduction to loss of statutory rights.
  • Causation in discrimination cases—the meaning of ‘because of’.

Things on the employment law front have been rather quiet for the last few weeks. At the time of writing we are still awaiting the publication of two Supreme Court decisions (already heard) of major importance, namely in the Uber litigation on employment/worker status in gig economy cases and the Royal Mencap case which will hopefully square the circle on when the national minimum wage applies to on-call/living in carers. Both have economic implications beyond their purely legal significance. In the meantime, we have had three EAT cases reported last month on communicating acceptance of employer repudiation by conduct, applying a Polkey (Polkey v A E Dayton Services Ltd [1987] 3 All ER 974)

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: When post-breach events rewrite damages claims
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
NLJ this week: Supreme Court redraws unfair prejudice rules
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
NLJ this week: ‘Joe Donor’ ruling exposes dangers of unregulated conception
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
NLJ this week: CILEX warns Mazur ruling must spark reform
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Conditional job offers carry hidden risks for employers
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll