header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

Employment law brief: 14 July 2017

© Copyright LexisNexis 2025. All Rights Reserved.
14 July 2017 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7754 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail
nlj_7754_smith

Before putting his feet up for the summer, Ian Smith goes above & beyond the call of duty

  • What constitutes a reasonable appeal?
  • Misconduct, conduct or culpability?
  • When can a pay protection scheme be relied on in an equal pay claim?

What constitutes a reasonable appeal procedure in an unfair dismissal case? Does an employee dismissed for misconduct have to have behaved ‘culpably’? When can a pay protection scheme be relied on as a defence to an equal pay claim? What is the meaning of life? Why are we all here? The answers to all these questions (except the last two) are contained in this month’s brief.

What constitutes a reasonable appeal?

The significance of an appeal system in a disciplinary procedure is well established. The decision of Simler P in Elmore v Governors of Darland High School UKEAT/0209/16 emphasises that whether an appeal was fairly conducted is a matter of fact for the tribunal, which may apply a test of whether the procedure was fair overall

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Law Society calls for clarity on AML
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
NLJ this week: Turning corporate liability into opportunity
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
NLJ this week: A prince no more?
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
NLJ this week: Shareholder secrecy sunk
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
NLJ this week: The expanding remit of national security law
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll