header-logo header-logo

Employment matters: the same but different?

08 July 2016 / Charles Pigott
Issue: 7706 / Categories: Opinion , Brexit , EU , Employment
printer mail-detail
nlj_7706_comment_pigott

It’s au revoir but not adieu to EU employment law, says Charles Pigott

The way the EU referendum was framed, and the manner in which the leave campaign was conducted, has left us with no clear idea of how the exit negotiations will be handled. It will probably take another general election to tell us that – if the EU is prepared to give us that much time. Without knowing which of the various options will be chosen – ranging from the Norway model to falling back on WTO rules – it is difficult to assess the likely impact on our employment law.

We do, however, know the starting point for the journey—our current body of employment law. The ambitions of the EU and the extent of its legislative competence are now set out in the Social Policy Chapter of the Treaty of Lisbon. That and its predecessors have, among many other things, given us TUPE, our laws on collective redundancy consultation and our rules on working time and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll