header-logo header-logo

Employment matters: the same but different?

08 July 2016 / Charles Pigott
Issue: 7706 / Categories: Opinion , Brexit , EU , Employment
printer mail-detail
nlj_7706_comment_pigott

It’s au revoir but not adieu to EU employment law, says Charles Pigott

The way the EU referendum was framed, and the manner in which the leave campaign was conducted, has left us with no clear idea of how the exit negotiations will be handled. It will probably take another general election to tell us that – if the EU is prepared to give us that much time. Without knowing which of the various options will be chosen – ranging from the Norway model to falling back on WTO rules – it is difficult to assess the likely impact on our employment law.

We do, however, know the starting point for the journey—our current body of employment law. The ambitions of the EU and the extent of its legislative competence are now set out in the Social Policy Chapter of the Treaty of Lisbon. That and its predecessors have, among many other things, given us TUPE, our laws on collective redundancy consultation and our rules on working time and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll