header-logo header-logo

Ethics on the payroll?

243952
The growing use of ethics bonus clauses in footballers’ employment contracts demands sophisticated drafting to avoid costly litigation, writes Dr Estelle Ivanova
  • Ethics bonus clauses are lawful in principle under French law, but only where they are drafted as objective, clearly defined remuneration components rather than disguised financial penalties.

Recent litigation involving the French national team professional footballer Kylian Mbappé, who currently plays for Real Madrid FC, has drawn renewed public attention to the use of so-called ethics bonus clauses in professional footballers’ employment contracts.

Designed to align sporting excellence with behavioural standards, these clauses raise complex questions under national labour law and sports regulations. Typically structured as a form of variable remuneration, ethics bonus clauses condition part of the player’s remuneration on complying with predefined standards of conduct, both on and off the field of play. These standards may relate to public statements, social media posts, adherence to club values, or broader expectations of exemplary behaviour as befits highly visible sports persons.

Contractual undertakings

On

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll