header-logo header-logo

Facing facts on court modernisation

04 August 2023 / Roger Smith
Issue: 8036 / Categories: Opinion , Profession , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail
132774
Will the courts & tribunals modernisation programme end up a victim of its own overambition? Roger Smith cuts through the government hype to find the facts

The House of Commons Public Accounts Committee (PAC) and the National Audit Office (NAO) are the heavyweight enforcers of governmental financial accountability. As a civil servant or minister, you really do not want to mess with either. Their job is to scrutinise the execution of government policies on the basis of ‘just the facts’—and, more particularly, the figures behind the facts. Not for them the artful seduction of loquacious hype. And, despite a lot of precisely that sort of guff from the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) and HM Courts & Tribunals Service (HMCTS), both auditing bodies have maintained a sceptical focus with regards to the courts and tribunals reform programme—as maintained in the latest report of the PAC published in June.

The reports of both bodies are all the more powerful for the predominance of understatement. Here is the NAO in its latest report

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll