header-logo header-logo

04 August 2023 / Roger Smith
Issue: 8036 / Categories: Opinion , Profession , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Facing facts on court modernisation

132774
Will the courts & tribunals modernisation programme end up a victim of its own overambition? Roger Smith cuts through the government hype to find the facts

The House of Commons Public Accounts Committee (PAC) and the National Audit Office (NAO) are the heavyweight enforcers of governmental financial accountability. As a civil servant or minister, you really do not want to mess with either. Their job is to scrutinise the execution of government policies on the basis of ‘just the facts’—and, more particularly, the figures behind the facts. Not for them the artful seduction of loquacious hype. And, despite a lot of precisely that sort of guff from the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) and HM Courts & Tribunals Service (HMCTS), both auditing bodies have maintained a sceptical focus with regards to the courts and tribunals reform programme—as maintained in the latest report of the PAC published in June.

The reports of both bodies are all the more powerful for the predominance of understatement. Here is the NAO in its latest report

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
Refusing ADR is risky—but not always fatal. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed and Sanjay Dave Singh of the University of Leicester analyse Assensus Ltd v Wirsol Energy Ltd: despite repeated invitations to mediate, the defendant stood firm, made a £100,000 Part 36 offer and was ultimately ‘wholly vindicated’ at trial
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
back-to-top-scroll