header-logo header-logo

Fair grounds?

21 May 2009 / John McMullen
Issue: 7370 / Categories: Features , Terms&conditions , Employment
printer mail-detail

Dr John McMullen on restructuring, downsizing & workforce lay-offs

* * * * * *

An employer's first step when approaching a redundancy selection should be to identify the pool of employees from which those who are to be made redundant will be selected, as this will be considered by an employment tribunal when assessing the fairness of the dismissal. If an employer simply dismisses an employee without first considering the pool, the dismissal is likely to be unfair, regardless of the fair selection criteria applied.

As far as possible, objective selection criteria, precisely defined and capable of being applied in an independent way should be used when determining which employees are to be selected for redundancy. Employers will often take into consideration a number of factors, and the simultaneous application of these criteria is recommended. Employers may apply different weightings to each criterion, and adopt a tie-break provision in the event of equal totals. The important question is whether the selection for redundancy was one which a reasonable employer could have made, taking

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll