header-logo header-logo

21 May 2009 / John McMullen
Issue: 7370 / Categories: Features , Terms&conditions , Employment
printer mail-detail

Fair grounds?

Dr John McMullen on restructuring, downsizing & workforce lay-offs

* * * * * *

An employer's first step when approaching a redundancy selection should be to identify the pool of employees from which those who are to be made redundant will be selected, as this will be considered by an employment tribunal when assessing the fairness of the dismissal. If an employer simply dismisses an employee without first considering the pool, the dismissal is likely to be unfair, regardless of the fair selection criteria applied.

As far as possible, objective selection criteria, precisely defined and capable of being applied in an independent way should be used when determining which employees are to be selected for redundancy. Employers will often take into consideration a number of factors, and the simultaneous application of these criteria is recommended. Employers may apply different weightings to each criterion, and adopt a tie-break provision in the event of equal totals. The important question is whether the selection for redundancy was one which a reasonable employer could have made, taking

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll