header-logo header-logo

21 May 2009 / John McMullen
Issue: 7370 / Categories: Features , Terms&conditions , Employment
printer mail-detail

Fair grounds?

Dr John McMullen on restructuring, downsizing & workforce lay-offs

* * * * * *

An employer's first step when approaching a redundancy selection should be to identify the pool of employees from which those who are to be made redundant will be selected, as this will be considered by an employment tribunal when assessing the fairness of the dismissal. If an employer simply dismisses an employee without first considering the pool, the dismissal is likely to be unfair, regardless of the fair selection criteria applied.

As far as possible, objective selection criteria, precisely defined and capable of being applied in an independent way should be used when determining which employees are to be selected for redundancy. Employers will often take into consideration a number of factors, and the simultaneous application of these criteria is recommended. Employers may apply different weightings to each criterion, and adopt a tie-break provision in the event of equal totals. The important question is whether the selection for redundancy was one which a reasonable employer could have made, taking

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll