header-logo header-logo

Fair grounds?

21 May 2009 / John McMullen
Issue: 7370 / Categories: Features , Terms&conditions , Employment
printer mail-detail

Dr John McMullen on restructuring, downsizing & workforce lay-offs

* * * * * *

An employer's first step when approaching a redundancy selection should be to identify the pool of employees from which those who are to be made redundant will be selected, as this will be considered by an employment tribunal when assessing the fairness of the dismissal. If an employer simply dismisses an employee without first considering the pool, the dismissal is likely to be unfair, regardless of the fair selection criteria applied.

As far as possible, objective selection criteria, precisely defined and capable of being applied in an independent way should be used when determining which employees are to be selected for redundancy. Employers will often take into consideration a number of factors, and the simultaneous application of these criteria is recommended. Employers may apply different weightings to each criterion, and adopt a tie-break provision in the event of equal totals. The important question is whether the selection for redundancy was one which a reasonable employer could have made, taking

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll