header-logo header-logo

Finding the right fit

236039
Charles Pigott explores reasonable adjustments, trial periods & alternative employment
  • The latest reasonable adjustments ruling from the Employment Appeal Tribunal consolidates our understanding of how the duty applies when an employee can no longer perform their current role due to disability, but wishes to be re-deployed.

Like many issues relating to the reasonable adjustments duty, the story starts with the House of Lords’ judgment in Archibald v Fife Council [2004] UKHL 32.

In one of the earliest disability discrimination cases to reach the House of Lords, Ms Archibald’s claim was brought under the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 (DDA 1995). The definition of the duty to make reasonable adjustments in DDA 1995 differed in a number of respects from its successor in the Equality Act 2010 (EqA 2010). However, the underlying principles are sufficiently close for cases decided under DDA 1995 to continue to be authoritative on the issues addressed in this article.

Under DDA 1995, one circumstance in which the duty could be triggered was if any ‘arrangements

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Winckworth Sherwood—Arcangelo D’Apolito

Winckworth Sherwood—Arcangelo D’Apolito

Private wealth and tax offering boosted by dual qualified partner hire

Sackers—John Card

Sackers—John Card

Pensions firm announces hire in project management team

Myers & Co—Kerry Boyle

Myers & Co—Kerry Boyle

Staffordshire firm appoints head of commercial property

NEWS
NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925 
HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)
NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll