header-logo header-logo

Finding the right fit

236039
Charles Pigott explores reasonable adjustments, trial periods & alternative employment
  • The latest reasonable adjustments ruling from the Employment Appeal Tribunal consolidates our understanding of how the duty applies when an employee can no longer perform their current role due to disability, but wishes to be re-deployed.

Like many issues relating to the reasonable adjustments duty, the story starts with the House of Lords’ judgment in Archibald v Fife Council [2004] UKHL 32.

In one of the earliest disability discrimination cases to reach the House of Lords, Ms Archibald’s claim was brought under the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 (DDA 1995). The definition of the duty to make reasonable adjustments in DDA 1995 differed in a number of respects from its successor in the Equality Act 2010 (EqA 2010). However, the underlying principles are sufficiently close for cases decided under DDA 1995 to continue to be authoritative on the issues addressed in this article.

Under DDA 1995, one circumstance in which the duty could be triggered was if any ‘arrangements

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll