header-logo header-logo

04 November 2010 / Simon Blain
Issue: 7440 / Categories: Features , Mediation , Family
printer mail-detail

Food for thought

Simon Blain digests some bread & butter cases

All too often, the cases appearing in the law reports seem to have little relevance to one’s day to day practice. Even the momentous decisions of the Supreme Court in Imerman and Granatino can feel as if they are of only academic interest, so far removed are they from the problems experienced by the majority of our clients.

Occasionally however, the higher courts do find themselves wrestling with the type of problem which faces every family law practitioner. One such case is Fisher-Aziz v Aziz [2010] EWCA Civ 673, in which Lord Justice Thorpe, sitting in the Court of Appeal, made some interesting observations about how courts should deal with the former matrimonial home when the family is mired in debt. Another is AA and NA [2010] EWHC 1282 Fam, in which Mr Justice Mostyn grappled with multiple allegations within private law residence and contact proceedings. Both judgments contain pearls of wisdom of direct relevance in daily practice.

Fisher-Aziz v Aziz

This is an exceptionally

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll