header-logo header-logo

23 November 2012 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7539 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

Free love

Jon Robins traces the origins of pro bono & examines how it is faring in these harsh economic times

In 1939, the Manchester Law Society, in a scheme backed by some 70 local firms, advised 4,290 people who otherwise would not have been able to afford legal advice.

I mention this to put the 11th National Pro Bono Week, which took place this month, into historical context. Lawyers have been offering free legal advice to clients, who wouldn’t otherwise secure access to justice, long before they started calling it “pro bono”—and without feeling the need to issue press releases like the one I received this month claiming that the “total value of pro bono work” was “around £456m per year”.

In fact, it was the radical lawyer, John Cooke—who led the prosecution of Charles I—who made the case for an organised legal aid system, which relied on lawyers providing free services, in his book The Poor Man’s Case published in 1648. The Manchester poor man lawyers’ scheme was the largest outside of London—coverage elsewhere

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll