header-logo header-logo

23 November 2012 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7539 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

Free love

Jon Robins traces the origins of pro bono & examines how it is faring in these harsh economic times

In 1939, the Manchester Law Society, in a scheme backed by some 70 local firms, advised 4,290 people who otherwise would not have been able to afford legal advice.

I mention this to put the 11th National Pro Bono Week, which took place this month, into historical context. Lawyers have been offering free legal advice to clients, who wouldn’t otherwise secure access to justice, long before they started calling it “pro bono”—and without feeling the need to issue press releases like the one I received this month claiming that the “total value of pro bono work” was “around £456m per year”.

In fact, it was the radical lawyer, John Cooke—who led the prosecution of Charles I—who made the case for an organised legal aid system, which relied on lawyers providing free services, in his book The Poor Man’s Case published in 1648. The Manchester poor man lawyers’ scheme was the largest outside of London—coverage elsewhere

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Anita Rasaratnam

Clarke Willmott—Anita Rasaratnam

Clarke Willmott strengthens social housing development offering with senior London appointment

Trowers & Hamlins—David Meecham

Trowers & Hamlins—David Meecham

Trowers strengthens Birmingham real estate team with partner hire

Blake Morgan—Jennifer Ray & Louise Culleton

Blake Morgan—Jennifer Ray & Louise Culleton

Blake Morgan expands private client and regulatory teams with new legal directors

NEWS
A mood of cautious optimism has enveloped the criminal law sector following indications the Prime Minister may abandon planned jury reforms
Helping to source the services and providers you need
The Senior Courts Costs Office has clarified that judges conducting detailed assessment proceedings cannot order security for costs—a ruling that may leave successful parties exposed to further litigation expense
Rejecting a generous settlement can prove an expensive mistake, as two recent high-profile cases demonstrate
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) continues to show that failing to disclose regulatory issues can attract harsher consequences than the original misconduct itself
back-to-top-scroll