header-logo header-logo

FSA fails to show teeth

04 December 2008
Issue: 7348 / Categories: Regulatory , Other practice areas
printer mail-detail

Regulatory law

Regulatory law
A senior criminal barrister has criticised the Financial Services Authority’s (FSA’s) failure to prosecute criminal offences within the sector.

Amanda Pinto QC, a tenant at 5 Paper Buildings and co-author of Corporate Criminal Liability, questions why the authority has chosen to deal with substantial offences, such as fraud and misleading conduct, as breaches of regulations rather than crimes. “These cases could be prosecuted in the criminal courts, yet the FSA chooses to deal with them as if they were simply regulatory infringements,” she says.

Responding to Pinto’s claims, Steven Francis, a former manager in the enforcement division of the FSA and now a partner at Reynolds Porter Chamberlain LLP, says that if the FSA takes the view that a court is unlikely to impose a custodial sentence, the appeal of pursuing the criminal route is much diminished.

“I can easily see a scenario where the FSA involves itself in a lengthy document-hungry insider dealing case and loses,” he says. “It would then expose itself to the criticism that it should have gone down the market abuse route: it’s so much quicker, cheaper and less risky!’”

Francis adds that the FSA might be tapping into the belief that there is little place in the criminal law in prohibitions where, for most people, the element of genuine stigma is “vanishingly small”.

Issue: 7348 / Categories: Regulatory , Other practice areas
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll