header-logo header-logo

Future of retained EU law in doubt beyond 2023

09 November 2022
Issue: 8002 / Categories: Legal News , EU , Brexit
printer mail-detail
The Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill could have a devastating impact on legal certainty in the UK, lawyers have warned.

Under the Bill, currently at committee stage, all retained EU law would be repealed on 31 December 2023, unless incorporated into UK domestic law.

At stake are thousands of retained EU laws (direct EU legislation and UK secondary legislation) affecting employment, transport, data protection, agriculture, environmental and consumer protections, and more—retained under former prime minister Theresa May’s EU (Withdrawal) Act 2018 following the UK’s departure from the EU. The retained laws include provisions on, for example, hazardous substances, building regulations, annual leave, equal pay, pregnancy rights, rest breaks and parental leave.

The Bill provides that the sunset date, currently the end of 2023, can be delayed until 23 June 2026 for specified pieces of legislation.

Law Society president Lubna Shuja (pictured) said the Bill ‘raises uncomfortable questions for parliamentary sovereignty, legal certainty, and the rule of law.

‘If the Bill passes in its present form, businesses cannot have any certainty about the legal and regulatory landscape beyond 2023. This would have a chilling effect on investment decisions, damage the UK’s standing as an international business hub and the global reputation of English law for certainty and predictability.

‘The Law Society therefore calls on the government to remove the arbitrary and unrealistic 2023 deadline in the sunset clause, to allow for a measured and thorough review of affected laws.’

The Bill also extends the Supreme Court’s power to depart from retained EU case law to other UK courts.

Shuja said this could result in different UK courts coming to ‘different, conflicting decisions’, and highlighted that ‘the legal test the Supreme Court uses to depart from its own rulings is necessarily high, uncodified and flexible. It reinforces legal clarity and certainty’.

According to Shoosmiths partner Charles Arrand and associate Hannah Howard, the Bill has the potential ‘to affect most, if not all, businesses in the UK’.

Michael Zander KC has written in NLJ this week on the Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill—read his article here.

Issue: 8002 / Categories: Legal News , EU , Brexit
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Declan Goodwin & Elinor Owen

Clarke Willmott—Declan Goodwin & Elinor Owen

Corporate and commercial teams in Cardiff boosted by dual partner hire

Hill Dickinson—Joz Coetzer & Marc Naidoo

Hill Dickinson—Joz Coetzer & Marc Naidoo

London hires to lead UK launch of international finance team

Switalskis—11 promotions

Switalskis—11 promotions

Firm marks start of year with firmwide promotions round

NEWS
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The next generation is inheriting more than assets—it is inheriting complexity. Writing in NLJ this week, experts from Penningtons Manches Cooper chart how global mobility, blended families and evolving values are reshaping private wealth advice
Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming sport, from recruitment and training to officiating and fan engagement. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dr Ian Blackshaw of Valloni Attorneys at Law explains how AI now influences everything from injury prevention to tactical decisions, with clubs using tools such as ‘TacticAI’ to gain competitive edges
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll