header-logo header-logo

Getting along (better) with the neighbours

20 October 2017 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 7766 / Categories: Features , Local government , Public
printer mail-detail
nlj_7766_dobson

Evicting anti-social tenants: hope in Dante’s inferno? Nicholas Dobson

  • The general application of public law principles to decisions of a local authority landlord must not be allowed to undermine the legislative scheme of this mandatory ground for possession.

When I was struggling with algebra in my early days at ‘Big School’ I remember buying Teach Yourself Algebra to help get to grips with the subject (and to keep sadistic schoolmasters at bay).

But I doubt whether any social housing tenant needs a Teach Yourself book to recognise anti-social behaviour (ASB) in neighbours. For this will be all too painfully apparent. As the Housing Ombudsman Service points out, ASB includes a wide range of bad behaviour including: noise nuisance at high levels or at unreasonable hours, drug and alcohol-related nuisance, vandalism and graffiti and harassment (including verbal and physical abuse and threats). Certainly a new circle of Dante’s Inferno for those living with it.

To tackle this, the Government has introduced a new mandatory ground for possession, grafted into the Housing

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll