header-logo header-logo

27 November 2025
Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-detail

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Partner joins labour and employment practice in London

Gibson Dunn has appointed Robbie Sinclair as a partner in its London office, joining the firm’s labour and employment practice group. He advises on contentious and strategic employment matters, with a particular focus on complex litigation, crisis management and investigations. The firm said his arrival will give it a stronger platform for employment litigation work in the UK and address clients’ strategic needs ‘in their boardrooms’.

Osma Hudda, co-chair of the London disputes group, highlighted growing market demand for specialist support in business protection, investigations and whistleblowing. Hudda said the firm is ‘executing a focused expansion’ of its litigation and investigations capability, adding that Sinclair’s practice ‘sits exactly at that intersection and squarely meets client demand’. The firm noted that its global labour and employment practice continues to be recognised by leading legal directories.

James Cox, partner in the London labour and employment practice group, said the team is ‘preeminent’, noting that Sinclair expands its senior bench for High Court litigation, team moves and investigations. He added that Sinclair ‘immediately enhances the seamless support’ provided to corporate, private equity and finance clients across both transactional and disputes matters.

Sinclair said Gibson Dunn’s global employment and disputes platform is ‘the right place to take my practice forward’. He emphasised that clients want consistent cross-jurisdictional advice and a team able to move ‘quickly from advisory to enforcement’, adding: ‘I’m excited to build that with colleagues in London, the US and internationally.’ The appointment follows a period of investment in the firm’s London disputes practice, including recent lateral hires and internal promotions.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll