header-logo header-logo

08 April 2016 / James Mather
Issue: 7694 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Give me shelter

The new register of companies' beneficial owners won’t prevent “real owners” taking refuge, as James Mather explains

The new requirement on English companies and LLPs to hold a register of “people with significant control” (PSCs), which applies from 6 April 2016, is designed to “bring information about company ownership into the open”. Obscure company ownership structures, the government stresses, can “facilitate tax evasion, money laundering and even terrorist financing”. It hopes that the register will impede such abuses by revealing “who is behind a company””, and has trumpeted the new register in the wake of the Panama Papers affair.

With such high expectations, one would therefore have expected the new rules to make clear that offshore discretionary trust structures are a primary target. While having their legitimate uses, after all, these are also the pre-eminent vehicle for obscuring ownership from creditors, spouses, tax authorities and the like. The “real owners” behind companies held in this way are surely the discretionary beneficiaries, often the settlor and members of his family. Where such beneficiaries make a request

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boodle Hatfield—Tom McLaughlin

Boodle Hatfield—Tom McLaughlin

Boodle Hatfield welcomes new employment partner, Tom McLaughlin

Arc Pensions Law—Victoria Thompson-Hill, Jonathan Mason & Georgi Ivanov

Arc Pensions Law—Victoria Thompson-Hill, Jonathan Mason & Georgi Ivanov

National specialist pensions law firm strengthens team with three new appointments

Jurit—Christian Abletshauser

Jurit—Christian Abletshauser

Jurit appoints Christian Abletshauser to lead family law practice

NEWS
Burges Salmon appoints Benn Richards to strengthen Contentious Insolvency offering
A High Court decision has clarified that a home may be unfit for human habitation not only where conditions endanger health or safety, but also where they seriously undermine comfort and convenience

A longer time limit for employment tribunal claims, new charity law thresholds, property tribunal recruitment and appellate guidance on small-claims costs feature in the latest Civil Way round-up

A recent High Court ruling could make issue estoppel considerably more complex in cross-border litigation, requiring parties to consider the foreign law governing the underlying claim
The Supreme Court has overturned Cheshire West’s bright-line test for deprivation of liberty, replacing it with a broader, more contextual assessment that gives greater weight to an individual’s wishes, feelings and apparent consent
back-to-top-scroll