header-logo header-logo

Government sets out plans for streamlined EU citizen application process (Brexit news flash)

10 November 2017
Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-detail
nlj_7752_davies_3_0

Ahead of Brexit talks re-commencing this week, the government released a new technical note setting out details of a “streamlined system” for EU nationals wanting to remain in the UK. The government hopes to instil confidence in EU citizens living in the UK by promising that their applications will not be refused on minor technicalities and caseworkers considering applications will exercise discretion where appropriate.The criteria for settled status will be as per the Withdrawal Agreement (which has not yet been  agreed) but it is anticipated that the majority of applications will be accepted.

The Government continues to be clear that its first priority in negotiations with the EU is to secure the status of EU citizens living in the UK, and UK nationals living in the EU. No EU citizen currently living in the UK lawfully will have to leave at the point that we leave the EU.

The key proposals of the paper are:

  • following the UK’s exit from the EU, the UK government aims to give EU citizens up to two years to apply to stay in the UK and obtain settled status with a voluntary application process to be set up before the UK leaves the EU;
  • lower cost process for those who already have permanent residence documentation;
  • digital and streamlined application system;
  • minimising the documentary evidence required from applicants and those with EEA permanent residence document will have a simple process to exchange this for a settled status document;
  • decisions to be based solely on the criteria set out in the Withdrawal Agreement;
  • enabling caseworkers to contact applicants to resolve minor discrepancies;
  • affordable application fee (no more than the cost of a British passport);
  • right to appeal a rejection;
  • no requirement for private health insurance; and
  • no requirement to provide fingerprints.

Secretary of State for Exiting the EU, David Davis believes ‘the document… can facilitate the deal we need to guarantee the rights of UK citizens living in the EU27, and vice versa’. Despite David Davis’ encouraging remarks, the European Parliament’s Brexit coordinator Guy Verhofstadt is quoted as saying ‘It's hard to believe this proposed new system will be smooth and efficient. The European Parliament remains deeply concerned about the lack of progress on citizens' rights issues. It is erroneous to say a deal is 'within touching distance'”.

When to apply?

While the Home Office continues to advise that EU citizens do not have to submit an application at the moment, our advice for those EU nationals who are already in the UK is to submit an application for residence documents or permanent residence as soon as possible. Advice should be sought where necessary.

The technical note is still only an informal document which offers helpful information and assurances but does not itself guarantee rights of EU nationals.

The negotiations are set to continue without a clear agreement on the position of both parties.

Contributors: Pat Saini (partner) and Edward Steabler (trainee), Penningtons Manches

 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bloomsbury Square Employment Law—Donna Clancy

Bloomsbury Square Employment Law—Donna Clancy

Employment law team strengthened with partner appointment

mfg Solicitors—Matt Smith

mfg Solicitors—Matt Smith

Corporate solicitor joins as partner in Birmingham

Freeths—Joe Lythgoe

Freeths—Joe Lythgoe

Corporate director with expertise in creative industries joins mergers and acquisitions team

NEWS
The High Court’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has thrown the careers of experienced CILEX litigators into jeopardy, warns Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers in NLJ this week
Sir Brian Leveson’s claim that there is ‘no right to jury trial’ erects a constitutional straw man, argues Professor Graham Zellick KC in NLJ this week. He argues that Leveson dismantles a position almost no-one truly holds, and thereby obscures the deeper issue: the jury’s place within the UK’s constitutional tradition
Why have private prosecutions surged despite limited data? Niall Hearty of Rahman Ravelli explores their rise in this week's NLJ 
The public law team at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer surveys significant recent human rights and judicial review rulings in this week's NLJ
In this week's NLJ, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley examines how debarring orders, while attractive to claimants seeking swift resolution, can complicate trials—most notably in fraud cases requiring ‘particularly cogent’ proof
back-to-top-scroll