header-logo header-logo

HIP extension attacked

06 September 2007
Issue: 7287 / Categories: Legal News , Property
printer mail-detail

In brief

The government’s decision to extend the mandatory use of home information packs (HIPs) and energy performance certificates (EPCs) from next week has been branded “highly irresponsible” by the Law Society.
The society says the government should have conducted a thorough review of the first phase of HIPs and EPCs before extending the scheme to smaller properties. The attack follows the announcement that HIPs and EPCs will be rolled out to three bedroom properties from 10 September.

Paul Marsh, Law Society vice president, says: “We are deeply disappointed that the government is continuing its cavalier approach to HIPs and the home buying process.

“The government needs to wait to ensure that the first tranche of HIPs has operated successfully before considering rolling it out to smaller properties, rather than rushing ahead prematurely. October would be a more acceptable earliest date for the introduction of HIPs, so that in September a full review of the introduction of HIPs could take place.”

The government, he says, appears to be bowing to pressure from those with a primary financial interest in the HIPs market, while there has been no formal communication to established stakeholders such as the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors, the National Association of Estate Agents, and the Law Society.

Issue: 7287 / Categories: Legal News , Property
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll