header-logo header-logo

06 September 2007
Issue: 7287 / Categories: Legal News , Property
printer mail-detail

HIP extension attacked

In brief

The government’s decision to extend the mandatory use of home information packs (HIPs) and energy performance certificates (EPCs) from next week has been branded “highly irresponsible” by the Law Society.
The society says the government should have conducted a thorough review of the first phase of HIPs and EPCs before extending the scheme to smaller properties. The attack follows the announcement that HIPs and EPCs will be rolled out to three bedroom properties from 10 September.

Paul Marsh, Law Society vice president, says: “We are deeply disappointed that the government is continuing its cavalier approach to HIPs and the home buying process.

“The government needs to wait to ensure that the first tranche of HIPs has operated successfully before considering rolling it out to smaller properties, rather than rushing ahead prematurely. October would be a more acceptable earliest date for the introduction of HIPs, so that in September a full review of the introduction of HIPs could take place.”

The government, he says, appears to be bowing to pressure from those with a primary financial interest in the HIPs market, while there has been no formal communication to established stakeholders such as the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors, the National Association of Estate Agents, and the Law Society.

Issue: 7287 / Categories: Legal News , Property
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll