header-logo header-logo

HMRC tightens squeeze on law firms

02 June 2011
Issue: 7468 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

An independent finance provider has reported a surge in the number of law firms seeking funds for their VAT bills following HMRC’s decision to wind up its “Time to Pay” scheme.

Syscap, which provides funding and financial advice to companies, says requests from law firms specifically related to funding for VAT bills doubled in the first quarter of 2011 compared to the same period last year, reaching 166. It attributes the rise to the fact HMRC has started to reject more Time to Pay tax deferral applications, and says it anticipates a further rise in funding requests as the impact of the increase in VAT to 20% in January takes full effect.

The scheme was a popular government initiative to allow viable businesses to defer tax payments during the economic downturn.

However, over the past 12 months, the number of scheme arrangements agreed by HMRC has fallen 43% from 57,800 to 32,900 in the first quarters of 2010 and 2011. In the same period, the number of rejected applicants rose by 50%.

Payment terms are becoming more stringent, Syscap reports, with businesses being offered shorter payment plans. Nearly two-thirds are now for three months or less. Businesses are sometimes being asked to apply for a bank loan or make a tax payment with a credit card before becoming eligible for the scheme.

Philip White, chief executive of Syscap, says: “Solicitors firms have been a heavy user of the Time to Pay scheme, and it is worrying that these figures show that HMRC is winding it down at a time when the legal profession is clearly still struggling. We may not technically be in recession, but if you look at the six month trend, growth is flat-lining."

Issue: 7468 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll