header-logo header-logo

02 June 2011
Issue: 7468 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

HMRC tightens squeeze on law firms

An independent finance provider has reported a surge in the number of law firms seeking funds for their VAT bills following HMRC’s decision to wind up its “Time to Pay” scheme.

Syscap, which provides funding and financial advice to companies, says requests from law firms specifically related to funding for VAT bills doubled in the first quarter of 2011 compared to the same period last year, reaching 166. It attributes the rise to the fact HMRC has started to reject more Time to Pay tax deferral applications, and says it anticipates a further rise in funding requests as the impact of the increase in VAT to 20% in January takes full effect.

The scheme was a popular government initiative to allow viable businesses to defer tax payments during the economic downturn.

However, over the past 12 months, the number of scheme arrangements agreed by HMRC has fallen 43% from 57,800 to 32,900 in the first quarters of 2010 and 2011. In the same period, the number of rejected applicants rose by 50%.

Payment terms are becoming more stringent, Syscap reports, with businesses being offered shorter payment plans. Nearly two-thirds are now for three months or less. Businesses are sometimes being asked to apply for a bank loan or make a tax payment with a credit card before becoming eligible for the scheme.

Philip White, chief executive of Syscap, says: “Solicitors firms have been a heavy user of the Time to Pay scheme, and it is worrying that these figures show that HMRC is winding it down at a time when the legal profession is clearly still struggling. We may not technically be in recession, but if you look at the six month trend, growth is flat-lining."

Issue: 7468 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—Nathan Evans

Birketts—Nathan Evans

Commercial and technology team in Cambridge strengthened by partner hire

Andrew & Andrew Solicitors—Shikha Datta

Andrew & Andrew Solicitors—Shikha Datta

Hampshire firm appoints head of new family department

Latham & Watkins—Sarah Lightdale

Latham & Watkins—Sarah Lightdale

Firm strengthens securities practice with partner return

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll