header-logo header-logo

02 June 2011
Issue: 7468 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

HMRC tightens squeeze on law firms

An independent finance provider has reported a surge in the number of law firms seeking funds for their VAT bills following HMRC’s decision to wind up its “Time to Pay” scheme.

Syscap, which provides funding and financial advice to companies, says requests from law firms specifically related to funding for VAT bills doubled in the first quarter of 2011 compared to the same period last year, reaching 166. It attributes the rise to the fact HMRC has started to reject more Time to Pay tax deferral applications, and says it anticipates a further rise in funding requests as the impact of the increase in VAT to 20% in January takes full effect.

The scheme was a popular government initiative to allow viable businesses to defer tax payments during the economic downturn.

However, over the past 12 months, the number of scheme arrangements agreed by HMRC has fallen 43% from 57,800 to 32,900 in the first quarters of 2010 and 2011. In the same period, the number of rejected applicants rose by 50%.

Payment terms are becoming more stringent, Syscap reports, with businesses being offered shorter payment plans. Nearly two-thirds are now for three months or less. Businesses are sometimes being asked to apply for a bank loan or make a tax payment with a credit card before becoming eligible for the scheme.

Philip White, chief executive of Syscap, says: “Solicitors firms have been a heavy user of the Time to Pay scheme, and it is worrying that these figures show that HMRC is winding it down at a time when the legal profession is clearly still struggling. We may not technically be in recession, but if you look at the six month trend, growth is flat-lining."

Issue: 7468 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll