header-logo header-logo

25 March 2022 / Charles Pigott
Issue: 7972 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Holiday pay: broadening the horizons?

75714
Charles Pigott reports on a Court of Appeal ruling widening the scope for back-dated holiday pay claims
  • As a result of the latest ruling in the Pimlico Plumbers holiday pay dispute, back-dated claims from miscategorised workers will be considerably easier to bring.
  • The decision also has implications for workers with historic claims for underpaid holiday.

Gary Smith’s claim for accrued holiday pay was finally upheld by the Court of Appeal in February 2022 (Smith v Pimlico Plumbers Ltd [2022] EWCA Civ 70, [2022] All ER (D) 11 (Feb)). The claim, valued at over £74,000, equates to four weeks’ holiday entitlement for each year of his engagement as a worker between August 2005 and May 2011.

Background

Mr Smith instituted proceedings in the employment tribunal in 2011, following the termination of his engagement with Pimlico Plumbers. He brought several claims, including for unpaid holiday entitlement, arguing that he was an employee, or alternatively a worker, and not a self-employed contractor as Pimlico Plumbers maintained.

At a preliminary hearing in

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll