header-logo header-logo

Holiday pay: broadening the horizons?

25 March 2022 / Charles Pigott
Issue: 7972 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail
75714
Charles Pigott reports on a Court of Appeal ruling widening the scope for back-dated holiday pay claims
  • As a result of the latest ruling in the Pimlico Plumbers holiday pay dispute, back-dated claims from miscategorised workers will be considerably easier to bring.
  • The decision also has implications for workers with historic claims for underpaid holiday.

Gary Smith’s claim for accrued holiday pay was finally upheld by the Court of Appeal in February 2022 (Smith v Pimlico Plumbers Ltd [2022] EWCA Civ 70, [2022] All ER (D) 11 (Feb)). The claim, valued at over £74,000, equates to four weeks’ holiday entitlement for each year of his engagement as a worker between August 2005 and May 2011.

Background

Mr Smith instituted proceedings in the employment tribunal in 2011, following the termination of his engagement with Pimlico Plumbers. He brought several claims, including for unpaid holiday entitlement, arguing that he was an employee, or alternatively a worker, and not a self-employed contractor as Pimlico Plumbers maintained.

At a preliminary hearing in

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll