header-logo header-logo

Hong Kong: small claims, big problem?

11 March 2022 / Dr Ping-fat Sze
Issue: 7970 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , International
printer mail-detail
74290
Lay litigants left behind: are small claims proceedings in Hong Kong fit for purpose? Dr Ping-fat Sze investigates
  • The Small Claims Tribunal of Hong Kong deals with over 42,000 contractual and tortious claims a year, the vast majority of which are resolved before proceeding to trial.
  • The tribunal is a popular forum for resourceful parties pursuing claims against individuals without any legal assistance.
  • It is argued that the tribunal is now ill-equipped to handle consumer disputes classified as small claims, given the complicated matters of law and fact involved.

In Hong Kong, the Small Claims Tribunal has virtually exclusive jurisdiction over most contractual and tortious claims not exceeding HK$75,000 (about £7,200). Pursuant to the Small Claims Tribunal Ordinance, proceedings in the tribunal are informal, the rules of evidence do not apply, and legal representation is excluded. The tribunal is also empowered to determine its own practice and procedure.

There are over 42,000 claims lodged with the tribunal each year, compared to approximately 10,000 civil actions filed with

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—19 appointments

DWF—19 appointments

Belfast team bolstered by three senior hires and 16 further appointments

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Firm strengthens leveraged finance team with London partner hire

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Double hire marks launch of family team in Leeds

NEWS
Small law firms want to embrace technology but feel lost in a maze of jargon, costs and compliance fears, writes Aisling O’Connell of the Solicitors Regulation Authority in this week's NLJ
The Supreme Court issued a landmark judgment in July that overturned the convictions of Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo, once poster boys of the Libor and Euribor scandal. In NLJ this week, Neil Swift of Peters & Peters considers what the ruling means for financial law enforcement
Charlie Mercer and Astrid Gillam of Stewarts crunch the numbers on civil fraud claims in the English courts, in this week's NLJ. New data shows civil fraud claims rising steadily since 2014, with the King’s Bench Division overtaking the Commercial Court as the forum of choice for lower-value disputes
Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre makes the case for ‘General Practice Pro Bono’—using core legal skills to deliver life-changing support, without the need for niche expertise—in this week's NLJ
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve reports on Haynes v Thomson, the first judicial application of the Supreme Court’s For Women Scotland ruling in a discrimination claim, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll