header-logo header-logo

Hong Kong: small claims, big problem?

11 March 2022 / Dr Ping-fat Sze
Issue: 7970 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , International
printer mail-detail
74290
Lay litigants left behind: are small claims proceedings in Hong Kong fit for purpose? Dr Ping-fat Sze investigates
  • The Small Claims Tribunal of Hong Kong deals with over 42,000 contractual and tortious claims a year, the vast majority of which are resolved before proceeding to trial.
  • The tribunal is a popular forum for resourceful parties pursuing claims against individuals without any legal assistance.
  • It is argued that the tribunal is now ill-equipped to handle consumer disputes classified as small claims, given the complicated matters of law and fact involved.

In Hong Kong, the Small Claims Tribunal has virtually exclusive jurisdiction over most contractual and tortious claims not exceeding HK$75,000 (about £7,200). Pursuant to the Small Claims Tribunal Ordinance, proceedings in the tribunal are informal, the rules of evidence do not apply, and legal representation is excluded. The tribunal is also empowered to determine its own practice and procedure.

There are over 42,000 claims lodged with the tribunal each year, compared to approximately 10,000 civil actions filed with

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll