header-logo header-logo

Hong Kong: small claims, big problem?

11 March 2022 / Dr Ping-fat Sze
Issue: 7970 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , International
printer mail-detail
74290
Lay litigants left behind: are small claims proceedings in Hong Kong fit for purpose? Dr Ping-fat Sze investigates
  • The Small Claims Tribunal of Hong Kong deals with over 42,000 contractual and tortious claims a year, the vast majority of which are resolved before proceeding to trial.
  • The tribunal is a popular forum for resourceful parties pursuing claims against individuals without any legal assistance.
  • It is argued that the tribunal is now ill-equipped to handle consumer disputes classified as small claims, given the complicated matters of law and fact involved.

In Hong Kong, the Small Claims Tribunal has virtually exclusive jurisdiction over most contractual and tortious claims not exceeding HK$75,000 (about £7,200). Pursuant to the Small Claims Tribunal Ordinance, proceedings in the tribunal are informal, the rules of evidence do not apply, and legal representation is excluded. The tribunal is also empowered to determine its own practice and procedure.

There are over 42,000 claims lodged with the tribunal each year, compared to approximately 10,000 civil actions filed with

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll