header-logo header-logo

Injustice in financial services disputes (Pt 3)

02 June 2017 / Michel Reznik
Issue: 7748 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail
nlj_7748_reznik

Michel Reznik reviews the principles of effective dispute resolution & endorses the introduction of a Financial Services Tribunal

  • Specialist dispute resolution forums are necessary in markets in which David habitually fights Goliath.
  • The Employment, Intellectual Property and Competition jurisdictions are examples where specialist disputes forums have proved essential to give David a chance at justice.
  • Adopting the specialist Financial Services Tribunal suggested by Richard Samuel would bring justice within the reach of SMEs.

Since the financial crisis, banks and financial services institutions have been exposed by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) for mis-conducting themselves, and, in particular, for mis-selling financial products to their SME (small and medium-sized enterprise) clients on an industrial scale. This reputation has been galvanised in the minds of the public by widely-publicised outcomes of investigations into scandals and by enormous fines meted out by regulatory bodies.

Victims of misconduct have rightly expected compensation. The question has been and remains: how and where are they going to get it? The Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS)

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll