header-logo header-logo

Injustice in financial services disputes (Pt 3)

02 June 2017 / Michel Reznik
Issue: 7748 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail
nlj_7748_reznik

Michel Reznik reviews the principles of effective dispute resolution & endorses the introduction of a Financial Services Tribunal

  • Specialist dispute resolution forums are necessary in markets in which David habitually fights Goliath.
  • The Employment, Intellectual Property and Competition jurisdictions are examples where specialist disputes forums have proved essential to give David a chance at justice.
  • Adopting the specialist Financial Services Tribunal suggested by Richard Samuel would bring justice within the reach of SMEs.

Since the financial crisis, banks and financial services institutions have been exposed by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) for mis-conducting themselves, and, in particular, for mis-selling financial products to their SME (small and medium-sized enterprise) clients on an industrial scale. This reputation has been galvanised in the minds of the public by widely-publicised outcomes of investigations into scandals and by enormous fines meted out by regulatory bodies.

Victims of misconduct have rightly expected compensation. The question has been and remains: how and where are they going to get it? The Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS)

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll