header-logo header-logo

03 September 2015 / Stephen Lewis
Issue: 7666 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

Iron clad?

nlj_7666_mclaughlin

Stephen Lewis, Laura Burgoyne & Conor McLaughlin on proposals for greater consumer protection on retailer insolvency

When the Christmas savings club Farepak collapsed in 2006, it owed £37m to financially vulnerable consumers, who rank as unsecured creditors on insolvency. Subsequently, the failure of high street retailers such as HMV and Land of Leather has brought the issue to the fore: what happens to gift vouchers and deposits when a retailer ceases to trade?

Consumer loss

The Law Commission examined 20 well-known high street insolvencies occurring between 2008 and 2014, as well as a number of smaller retailers. It found that most gift vouchers holders were not significantly disadvantaged when the issuing retailer became insolvent. Depending on commercial and legal considerations, administrators may decide to accept gift vouchers during a period of trading in administration, and the amounts held tended to be relatively small (for example, an average of £8.12 in the case of Zavvi).

Where prepayments took the form of deposits for pre-ordered goods, the value of individual prepayments and the total amount of consumer funds held by retailers tended

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll