header-logo header-logo

Iron clad?

03 September 2015 / Stephen Lewis
Issue: 7666 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail
nlj_7666_mclaughlin

Stephen Lewis, Laura Burgoyne & Conor McLaughlin on proposals for greater consumer protection on retailer insolvency

When the Christmas savings club Farepak collapsed in 2006, it owed £37m to financially vulnerable consumers, who rank as unsecured creditors on insolvency. Subsequently, the failure of high street retailers such as HMV and Land of Leather has brought the issue to the fore: what happens to gift vouchers and deposits when a retailer ceases to trade?

Consumer loss

The Law Commission examined 20 well-known high street insolvencies occurring between 2008 and 2014, as well as a number of smaller retailers. It found that most gift vouchers holders were not significantly disadvantaged when the issuing retailer became insolvent. Depending on commercial and legal considerations, administrators may decide to accept gift vouchers during a period of trading in administration, and the amounts held tended to be relatively small (for example, an average of £8.12 in the case of Zavvi).

Where prepayments took the form of deposits for pre-ordered goods, the value of individual prepayments and the total amount of consumer funds held by retailers tended

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll