header-logo header-logo

06 April 2017
Issue: 7741 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Costs , Jackson
printer mail-detail

Jackson fixed costs webinar—a mid-term review

Lord Justice Jackson is advocating a pilot of fixed recoverable costs in the mercantile court as part of his review of fixed recoverable costs in England and Wales.

Interviewed by Professor Dominic Regan for an exclusive NLJ webinar, Jackson LJ said he hoped to launch voluntary pilot schemes in cases of up to £250,000 in value in the mercantile courts in London and Manchester and in the other two specialist courts in Manchester.

“If the Rule Committee approves it the pilot will be modelled on the very successful system which operates in the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court. There will be a scale of costs for each stage of the case. The scale figure will be a cap rather than a fixed sum so that if that particular stage requires no or minimal work or less work than envisaged there's a lower sum. And then on top of the scale of costs for each element of the case there is an overall cap on recoverable costs.

“My proposal is that it is should be entirely voluntary. If claimants wish to issue in this fixed costs or capped costs list they can do so. If defendants object the case will come out. If defendants are content then, with the agreement of all parties, the litigation will proceed under this regime which will restrict recoverable costs and which will contain an expedited procedure in order to reduce the burden of work on the lawyers for each party.”

“The proposed pilot will be limited to cases up to £250,000 in value. If a case is above that, even if both parties want to go into the pilot they can't do so and I hope we will get, a sense of how much the market wants this and useful feedback about how the pilot rules are working."

Jackson LJ said his objective in undertaking the review was “to put forward a package of reforms which will promote access to justice and, so far as I properly can, control costs”.

He emphasised that he had four months left in which to clarify his thinking and prepare his report, which is due 31 July 2017.

The webinar, which includes: a review of how Jackson LJ has been conducting the review since January; the types and areas of litigation under review; incurred costs; and the impact of costs budgeting, can be downloaded here.

Issue: 7741 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Costs , Jackson
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll