header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
31 January 2025 / Charles Kuhn
Issue: 8102 / Categories: Opinion , Criminal , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Jury trials: in the dock

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
206026
What will be the verdict on replacing juries with an intermediate tier? Charles Kuhn examines the evidence

Following a substantial increase in Crown Court backlogs, the Ministry of Justice has floated the idea of restricting the use of jury trials and creating an ‘intermediate tier’ of court offences. The aim is to push some less serious cases, such as shoplifting and drug offences, away from a judge or jury trial to an intermediate tier, which is somewhere between a jury trial and a magistrates-only trial.

The intermediate tier would be comprised of a judge, supported by two magistrates. The purpose of this change is to make inroads into the backlogs, which currently stand at around 73,000 Crown Court cases and are predicted to reach 100,000.

Former High Court judge Sir Brian Leveson is to lead a review, aiming for completion in spring 2025. It will also look at expanding magistrates’ sentencing powers from six months to 12 months to bring about more capacity in the magistrates’ courts.

Unsurprisingly, the idea

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Switalskis—Naila Arif, Harriet Findlay & Ellie Thompson

Switalskis—Naila Arif, Harriet Findlay & Ellie Thompson

Firm awards training contracts to paralegals through internal programme

Ward Hadaway—Matthew Morton

Ward Hadaway—Matthew Morton

Private client disputes specialist joins commercial litigation team

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Nina Hood

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Nina Hood

Cumbria firm appoints new head of residential property

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
NLJ this week: Family law urged to ditch adversarial instincts
Family law must shift from conflict-driven litigation to child-centred problem-solving, according to a major new report. Writing in NLJ this week, Caroline Bowden of Anthony Gold outlines findings showing overwhelming support for reform, with 92% agreeing lawyers owe duties to children as well as clients
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll