header-logo header-logo

31 January 2025 / Charles Kuhn
Issue: 8102 / Categories: Opinion , Criminal , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Jury trials: in the dock

206026
What will be the verdict on replacing juries with an intermediate tier? Charles Kuhn examines the evidence

Following a substantial increase in Crown Court backlogs, the Ministry of Justice has floated the idea of restricting the use of jury trials and creating an ‘intermediate tier’ of court offences. The aim is to push some less serious cases, such as shoplifting and drug offences, away from a judge or jury trial to an intermediate tier, which is somewhere between a jury trial and a magistrates-only trial.

The intermediate tier would be comprised of a judge, supported by two magistrates. The purpose of this change is to make inroads into the backlogs, which currently stand at around 73,000 Crown Court cases and are predicted to reach 100,000.

Former High Court judge Sir Brian Leveson is to lead a review, aiming for completion in spring 2025. It will also look at expanding magistrates’ sentencing powers from six months to 12 months to bring about more capacity in the magistrates’ courts.

Unsurprisingly, the idea

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll