header-logo header-logo

Jury trials: in the dock

31 January 2025 / Charles Kuhn
Issue: 8102 / Categories: Opinion , Criminal , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail
206026
What will be the verdict on replacing juries with an intermediate tier? Charles Kuhn examines the evidence

Following a substantial increase in Crown Court backlogs, the Ministry of Justice has floated the idea of restricting the use of jury trials and creating an ‘intermediate tier’ of court offences. The aim is to push some less serious cases, such as shoplifting and drug offences, away from a judge or jury trial to an intermediate tier, which is somewhere between a jury trial and a magistrates-only trial.

The intermediate tier would be comprised of a judge, supported by two magistrates. The purpose of this change is to make inroads into the backlogs, which currently stand at around 73,000 Crown Court cases and are predicted to reach 100,000.

Former High Court judge Sir Brian Leveson is to lead a review, aiming for completion in spring 2025. It will also look at expanding magistrates’ sentencing powers from six months to 12 months to bring about more capacity in the magistrates’ courts.

Unsurprisingly, the idea

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll