header-logo header-logo

Keep on trucking

istock_000001271407medium_4

David Renton examines how the Working Time Regulations apply to mobile workers

King Alfred the Great is supposed to have spent eight hours each day a week in prayer, eight hours in sleep, and only eight hours at work. The European Working Time Directive supplies our modern limits: workers’ rights to rest breaks, daily rest, weekly rest, maximum weekly working time and annual leave, which form an increasing part of all employment lawyers’ workload.

Ross v Eddie Stobart

In Ross v Eddie Stobart Ltd [2011] EAT/0085/10, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has had to consider two issues left unclear from the Working Time Regulations 1998 (SI 1998/1833) (WTR) which implement the Directive: first, how far do these rights extend to workers who are partially excepted from the Regulations, and second, is the 48-hour limit capable of enforcement by way of an Employment Tribunal (ET) claim?

The claimant was a lorry driver who was required to work in excess of 48 hours per week over a 17-week period.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll