header-logo header-logo

Keeping up with the Joneses (& TUPE)!

16 July 2015 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7661 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail
nlj_7661_smith

Ian Smith recommends some light reading

Employment lawyers wondering what reading matter to pack as they head for their foreign holidays might well be advised to include a copy of the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 (SI 2006/246) (TUPE). Not only will this look incredibly cool on trendy beaches, transforming them instantly from nerds into babe/hunk magnets, but it might even give them an outside chance of keeping up with the law in this notorious area. Two cases are reported in this month’s column, both on basic questions which in any sane area of law would have been settled 20 years ago.

Also selected this month are a Court of Appeal decision on an important point on the definition of indirect discrimination and a rare case on the Information and Consultation of Employees Regulations 2004 (SI 2004/ 3426) which shows a distinction from the much more widely used rules on collective redundancy consultation, which could be doubly disadvantageous to employees.

TUPE (1)

One requirement of a service provision

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll