header-logo header-logo

16 July 2015 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7661 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Keeping up with the Joneses (& TUPE)!

nlj_7661_smith

Ian Smith recommends some light reading

Employment lawyers wondering what reading matter to pack as they head for their foreign holidays might well be advised to include a copy of the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 (SI 2006/246) (TUPE). Not only will this look incredibly cool on trendy beaches, transforming them instantly from nerds into babe/hunk magnets, but it might even give them an outside chance of keeping up with the law in this notorious area. Two cases are reported in this month’s column, both on basic questions which in any sane area of law would have been settled 20 years ago.

Also selected this month are a Court of Appeal decision on an important point on the definition of indirect discrimination and a rare case on the Information and Consultation of Employees Regulations 2004 (SI 2004/ 3426) which shows a distinction from the much more widely used rules on collective redundancy consultation, which could be doubly disadvantageous to employees.

TUPE (1)

One requirement of a service provision

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Sidley—Jeremy Trinder

Sidley—Jeremy Trinder

Global finance group strengthened by returning partner in London

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

NEWS
The controversial Courts and Tribunals Bill has passed its second reading by 304 votes to 203, despite concerted opposition from the legal profession
The presumption of parental involvement is to be abolished, the Lord Chancellor David Lammy has confirmed
A highly experienced chartered legal executive has been prevented from representing her client in financial remedies proceedings, in a case that highlights the continued fallout from Mazur
Plans to commandeer 50%-75% of the interest on lawyers’ client accounts to fund the justice system overlook the cost and administrative burden of this on small and medium law firms, CILEX has warned
Lawyers have been asked for their views on proposals to change the penalties for assaulting a police officer
back-to-top-scroll