header-logo header-logo

Keeping up with the neighbours

03 May 2013 / Sarah Caroline Boyle , Kate Molan
Issue: 7558 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail
istock_000007233279medium

Scottish legislators are ahead on cohabitation law, say Sarah Caroline Boyle & Kate Molan

Despite our close geography, Scots law and the law of England and Wales could scarcely be more different—certainly in relation to the financial consequences of personal relationships. This brings both opportunity (and risk) for practitioners north and south of the border. Despite Lady Hale’s highly publicised comments on the huge disparity in approach between our jurisdictions in the Supreme Court case of Gow v Grant [2012] UKSC 29, many English and Welsh practitioners are not alive to the Scottish provision—and the opportunities in even, apparently, “English” cases. There may still be scope to raise proceedings in Scotland and take advantage of the law in relation to financial provision for cohabitants. 

Scotland

The Family Law (Scotland) Act 2006 (FL(S)A 2006) gave cohabiting individuals (limited) rights in the event of their cohabitation ending (whether on death or relationship breakdown). Claims on death are not tackled in this article—they exist only if the deceased died intestate. Such

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll