header-logo header-logo

03 May 2013 / Sarah Caroline Boyle , Kate Molan
Issue: 7558 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Keeping up with the neighbours

istock_000007233279medium

Scottish legislators are ahead on cohabitation law, say Sarah Caroline Boyle & Kate Molan

Despite our close geography, Scots law and the law of England and Wales could scarcely be more different—certainly in relation to the financial consequences of personal relationships. This brings both opportunity (and risk) for practitioners north and south of the border. Despite Lady Hale’s highly publicised comments on the huge disparity in approach between our jurisdictions in the Supreme Court case of Gow v Grant [2012] UKSC 29, many English and Welsh practitioners are not alive to the Scottish provision—and the opportunities in even, apparently, “English” cases. There may still be scope to raise proceedings in Scotland and take advantage of the law in relation to financial provision for cohabitants. 

Scotland

The Family Law (Scotland) Act 2006 (FL(S)A 2006) gave cohabiting individuals (limited) rights in the event of their cohabitation ending (whether on death or relationship breakdown). Claims on death are not tackled in this article—they exist only if the deceased died intestate. Such

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll