header-logo header-logo

Keeping up with the neighbours

03 May 2013 / Sarah Caroline Boyle , Kate Molan
Issue: 7558 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail
istock_000007233279medium

Scottish legislators are ahead on cohabitation law, say Sarah Caroline Boyle & Kate Molan

Despite our close geography, Scots law and the law of England and Wales could scarcely be more different—certainly in relation to the financial consequences of personal relationships. This brings both opportunity (and risk) for practitioners north and south of the border. Despite Lady Hale’s highly publicised comments on the huge disparity in approach between our jurisdictions in the Supreme Court case of Gow v Grant [2012] UKSC 29, many English and Welsh practitioners are not alive to the Scottish provision—and the opportunities in even, apparently, “English” cases. There may still be scope to raise proceedings in Scotland and take advantage of the law in relation to financial provision for cohabitants. 

Scotland

The Family Law (Scotland) Act 2006 (FL(S)A 2006) gave cohabiting individuals (limited) rights in the event of their cohabitation ending (whether on death or relationship breakdown). Claims on death are not tackled in this article—they exist only if the deceased died intestate. Such

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll