header-logo header-logo

03 May 2013 / Sarah Caroline Boyle , Kate Molan
Issue: 7558 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Keeping up with the neighbours

istock_000007233279medium

Scottish legislators are ahead on cohabitation law, say Sarah Caroline Boyle & Kate Molan

Despite our close geography, Scots law and the law of England and Wales could scarcely be more different—certainly in relation to the financial consequences of personal relationships. This brings both opportunity (and risk) for practitioners north and south of the border. Despite Lady Hale’s highly publicised comments on the huge disparity in approach between our jurisdictions in the Supreme Court case of Gow v Grant [2012] UKSC 29, many English and Welsh practitioners are not alive to the Scottish provision—and the opportunities in even, apparently, “English” cases. There may still be scope to raise proceedings in Scotland and take advantage of the law in relation to financial provision for cohabitants. 

Scotland

The Family Law (Scotland) Act 2006 (FL(S)A 2006) gave cohabiting individuals (limited) rights in the event of their cohabitation ending (whether on death or relationship breakdown). Claims on death are not tackled in this article—they exist only if the deceased died intestate. Such

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll