header-logo header-logo

Legal aid: welcome to the fight

20 May 2022 / Roger Smith
Issue: 7979 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-detail
81963
Legal aid has been run into the ground. Is it time for public defenders to step in, asks Roger Smith

No reader can be unaware that the Criminal Bar Association is conducting a major campaign for better remuneration. Its Twitter account headlines its uncompromising stand: ‘Unless and until there is substantial movement to meet our legitimate demands, don’t expect a ballot of members on withdrawing its current industrial action.’

The Bar’s most effective weapon has been its policy of members refusing to take late return briefs. This removes flexibility from the scheme, adds further delay to a justice system near to breakdown from a decade of cuts and court closures, and causes victims politically visible pain. Unfortunate but necessary industrial action. I have no principled problem with that. Politicians want to play politics with legal aid? Welcome to the fight. I am for the lawyers.

I do have an issue, however, with one of the demands of the campaign: that barristers will not join the fledgling Public Defender

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

Forum of Insurance Lawyers elects president for 2026

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Partner joinslabour and employment practice in London

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

NEWS
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll