header-logo header-logo

A licence to govern

22 January 2009 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 7353 / Categories: Features , Public , Legal services , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Unpopular but not unlawful. Nicholas Dobson gives the court’s verdict on the hike in child care court fees

Last year’s dramatic hike in court fees for public law child care and placement order applications was brought in to achieve the simple policy objective of fixing fees to reflect the true cost of these applications. But the breathtaking increases (which saw child care applications rising from £150 to £4,825 and those for placement orders from £100 to £400) attracted some sustained public law bombardment from four local authorities in judicial review proceedings brought against the lord chancellor and the secretary of state for communities and local government.

The authorities were London Borough of Hillingdon, Leeds and Liverpool City Councils and Norfolk County Council. They challenged the lawfulness of the court fee increases instituted by the Family Proceedings Fees Order 2008, (SI 2008/1054) and the Magistrates’ Courts Fees Order 2008 (SI 2008/1052). However, their combined firepower was ultimately unsuccessful, despite launching batteries of heavy ordnance loaded with warheads including: failure to consult on the
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll