header-logo header-logo

A licence to govern

22 January 2009 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 7353 / Categories: Features , Public , Legal services , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Unpopular but not unlawful. Nicholas Dobson gives the court’s verdict on the hike in child care court fees

Last year’s dramatic hike in court fees for public law child care and placement order applications was brought in to achieve the simple policy objective of fixing fees to reflect the true cost of these applications. But the breathtaking increases (which saw child care applications rising from £150 to £4,825 and those for placement orders from £100 to £400) attracted some sustained public law bombardment from four local authorities in judicial review proceedings brought against the lord chancellor and the secretary of state for communities and local government.

The authorities were London Borough of Hillingdon, Leeds and Liverpool City Councils and Norfolk County Council. They challenged the lawfulness of the court fee increases instituted by the Family Proceedings Fees Order 2008, (SI 2008/1054) and the Magistrates’ Courts Fees Order 2008 (SI 2008/1052). However, their combined firepower was ultimately unsuccessful, despite launching batteries of heavy ordnance loaded with warheads including: failure to consult on the
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll