header-logo header-logo

22 January 2009 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 7353 / Categories: Features , Public , Legal services , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

A licence to govern

Unpopular but not unlawful. Nicholas Dobson gives the court’s verdict on the hike in child care court fees

Last year’s dramatic hike in court fees for public law child care and placement order applications was brought in to achieve the simple policy objective of fixing fees to reflect the true cost of these applications. But the breathtaking increases (which saw child care applications rising from £150 to £4,825 and those for placement orders from £100 to £400) attracted some sustained public law bombardment from four local authorities in judicial review proceedings brought against the lord chancellor and the secretary of state for communities and local government.

The authorities were London Borough of Hillingdon, Leeds and Liverpool City Councils and Norfolk County Council. They challenged the lawfulness of the court fee increases instituted by the Family Proceedings Fees Order 2008, (SI 2008/1054) and the Magistrates’ Courts Fees Order 2008 (SI 2008/1052). However, their combined firepower was ultimately unsuccessful, despite launching batteries of heavy ordnance loaded with warheads including: failure to consult on the
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll