header-logo header-logo

Litigation trends: technology, diversity, and Brexit

31 January 2020
Issue: 7872 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Brexit
printer mail-detail
Law firms should embrace technology, flexible hours and remote working to break down barriers in the legal profession, the President of the London Solicitors Litigation Association (LSLA) has said

The annual NLJ and LSLA Litigation Trends Survey, published this week, reveals that 83% of the Capital’s litigators believe more needs to be done to improve diversity and inclusion in the profession. One respondent said that BAME (Black and minority ethnic) lawyers were prevalent at the middle levels of the profession but talent ‘is not being progressed to the higher levels’ in the legal profession.

Respondents were asked what areas firms should focus on to boost diversity and inclusion. The top three areas given were: encouraging flexible working and job sharing (81%); promoting and supporting social mobility (77%); and focusing on workplace culture to create a place where every voice is welcomed, heard and respected (75%).

Julian Acratopulo, LSLA President and Clifford Chance partner, said: ‘I firmly believe that technology is absolutely key to this.

‘Diversity and technology go hand in hand, and need to be viewed as such.  Better digitisation opens up more opportunities for lawyers to work flexibly or remotely (as cases can be conducted online rather than in person).  This helps to break down the barriers that can dissuade people from joining or progressing in the profession.’

Brexit could boost profits: two-thirds predict an ‘inevitable’ post-Brexit spike in litigation affecting cross-border businesses. Only 28% expect a material flight of litigation work from London after Brexit.

More than a third (38%) perceived the litigation market as unchanged in the past two or three years, and 44% said it was growing.

Moreover, the cost of litigation in London is not a significant factor for clients, according to 58% of litigators. Multiple respondents said London remains favourable due to its reputation for high quality judges, judicial independence and procedural features.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll