header-logo header-logo

Litigation trends: technology, diversity, and Brexit

31 January 2020
Issue: 7872 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Brexit
printer mail-detail
Law firms should embrace technology, flexible hours and remote working to break down barriers in the legal profession, the President of the London Solicitors Litigation Association (LSLA) has said

The annual NLJ and LSLA Litigation Trends Survey, published this week, reveals that 83% of the Capital’s litigators believe more needs to be done to improve diversity and inclusion in the profession. One respondent said that BAME (Black and minority ethnic) lawyers were prevalent at the middle levels of the profession but talent ‘is not being progressed to the higher levels’ in the legal profession.

Respondents were asked what areas firms should focus on to boost diversity and inclusion. The top three areas given were: encouraging flexible working and job sharing (81%); promoting and supporting social mobility (77%); and focusing on workplace culture to create a place where every voice is welcomed, heard and respected (75%).

Julian Acratopulo, LSLA President and Clifford Chance partner, said: ‘I firmly believe that technology is absolutely key to this.

‘Diversity and technology go hand in hand, and need to be viewed as such.  Better digitisation opens up more opportunities for lawyers to work flexibly or remotely (as cases can be conducted online rather than in person).  This helps to break down the barriers that can dissuade people from joining or progressing in the profession.’

Brexit could boost profits: two-thirds predict an ‘inevitable’ post-Brexit spike in litigation affecting cross-border businesses. Only 28% expect a material flight of litigation work from London after Brexit.

More than a third (38%) perceived the litigation market as unchanged in the past two or three years, and 44% said it was growing.

Moreover, the cost of litigation in London is not a significant factor for clients, according to 58% of litigators. Multiple respondents said London remains favourable due to its reputation for high quality judges, judicial independence and procedural features.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll