header-logo header-logo

28 April 2017 / Charles Pigott
Issue: 7743 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Locked down?

nlj_7743_pigott

Has the Supreme Court signalled that the law surrounding the Working Time Regulations has been settled, asks Charles Pigott

  • The Supreme Court has refused permission to appeal in the latest round of holiday pay litigation.
  • There are still some loose ends to tie up, but further assistance from the UK’s top court looks unlikely.

British Gas’s application for permission to appeal against last year’s Court of Appeal decision in Lock v British Gas [2016] EWCA Civ 983, [2016] IRLR 946 was refused on 28 February. The reason given was that the application did not raise an arguable point of law. So does this mean that the law on the calculation of statutory holiday pay is now settled?

The commission issue

Last year’s Court of Appeal decision was ostensibly about the narrow issue of whether the Working Time Regulations (SI 1998/1833) (WTR) could be interpreted in a way that was consistent with the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in the same litigation ([2014] All ER (EC) 1194, [2014] IRLR

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll