header-logo header-logo

Locked down?

28 April 2017 / Charles Pigott
Issue: 7743 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail
nlj_7743_pigott

Has the Supreme Court signalled that the law surrounding the Working Time Regulations has been settled, asks Charles Pigott

  • The Supreme Court has refused permission to appeal in the latest round of holiday pay litigation.
  • There are still some loose ends to tie up, but further assistance from the UK’s top court looks unlikely.

British Gas’s application for permission to appeal against last year’s Court of Appeal decision in Lock v British Gas [2016] EWCA Civ 983, [2016] IRLR 946 was refused on 28 February. The reason given was that the application did not raise an arguable point of law. So does this mean that the law on the calculation of statutory holiday pay is now settled?

The commission issue

Last year’s Court of Appeal decision was ostensibly about the narrow issue of whether the Working Time Regulations (SI 1998/1833) (WTR) could be interpreted in a way that was consistent with the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in the same litigation ([2014] All ER (EC) 1194, [2014] IRLR

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hill Dickinson—Paul Matthews, Liz Graham & Sarah Pace

Hill Dickinson—Paul Matthews, Liz Graham & Sarah Pace

Leeds office strengthened with triple partner hire

Clarke Willmott—Oksana Howard

Clarke Willmott—Oksana Howard

Corporate lawyer joins as partner in London office

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll