header-logo header-logo

Lord Rodger

30 June 2011
Issue: 7472 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Lord Rodger of Earlsferry, justice of the Supreme Court and former lord advocate, has died at the age of 66

Rodger joined the Scottish Faculty of Advocates in 1974. He became lord advocate in 1992 and served in that post until 1995, when he became a Court of Session judge.

Lord Phillips, president of the Supreme Court, said: “He was appointed a Lord of Appeal in Ordinary in 2001 and from that moment his colleagues delighted in the enthusiasm with which he applied his intellect to the challenge posed by each case before him, his clarity of thought and insight that often revealed an aspect of the case that might have passed unperceived and the language, and indeed the accent, in which he forcibly expressed his views.”

Lord Hope said: “Our thoughts are with his family and his many close friends, whose lives were enriched by his generous and engaging personality and who meant so much to him too. His legacy is to be found in his judgments, his lectures and his academic writings.”

Issue: 7472 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

Forum of Insurance Lawyers elects president for 2026

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Partner joinslabour and employment practice in London

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

NEWS
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll