header-logo header-logo

M & S PROFILE: Louisa Ghevaert

02 September 2014
Categories: Movers & Shakers
printer mail-detail
louisa_ghevaert_2

The award-winning UK fertility & family law expert calls for further diversity within the profession

Louisa Ghevaert is a leading expert in UK fertility and family law and now heads up the fertility and parenting law practice at Michelmores SolicitorsShe has dealt with numerous well-known UK fertility law cases and has pioneered the practice of fertility and family law in the UK.

Louisa’s award-winning legal practice covers international and UK surrogacy, donor conception, fertility treatment law, posthumous conception, co-parenting and known donation, inter-country adoption, divorce and finances, cohabitation and complex children and family law.

What was your route into the profession?

After graduating from the University of Bristol with an Honours Degree in History, I spent two years at the College of Law in Guildford where I undertook the Common Professional Entrance (CPE) and Legal Practice Course (LPC). I went on to qualify as a solicitor in 2000. Since then, I’ve been very fortunate to pursue a specialist cutting-edge legal career in fertility and family law.

What has been your biggest career challenge so far?

Helping to win recognition for fertility law in the UK. It’s a very specialist and fast-moving area of law that struggles to keep pace with the creation of modern families and it can be a legal minefield for prospective parents and their children. 

Which person within the legal profession inspires you most?

Baroness Brenda Hale as she’s Britain’s most senior female judge, a family lawyer, and the first woman to sit in the Supreme Court of the UK.

If you weren’t a lawyer, what would you choose as an alternate career?

I’d become a writer. I really enjoy writing articles and publications as part of my legal practice and I’d love to turn my hand to some creative fiction.

Who is your favourite fictional lawyer?

It’s currently Martha Costello QC, played by Maxine Peake, from the hit BBC TV series Silk. Martha’s savvy, strong and hard-working. It was great to see a lead female role in this prime time legal drama, written by former barrister Peter Moffat.

What change would you make to the profession?

I’d like to see more women take up senior posts in the legal profession and for there to be greater diversity to reflect our society as a whole.

How do you relax?

Having a hard-won family of my own, I relax by spending my time at home with my young family. I like to travel and visit new places with them.

 

Categories: Movers & Shakers
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll