header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
22 November 2018 / John Tanburn
Issue: 7818 / Categories: Features , Technology , In Court
printer mail-detail

Mending the net

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

​Is it time for a specialist IT court to tackle torts committed online? John Tanburn weighs up the evidence

  • A specialised IT division of the High Court and technically-enabled county courts are needed to address torts committed online.
  • Court structure after Brexit needs to be determined now.

Torts are committed with impunity on the web: driving children to suicide, shredding reputations, threatening death and rape, leaving victims without redress. The law has always provided remedies against such torts, but has so far failed to do so when they are committed online. This will not do. The very credibility of the law is at stake unless its rule extends to the web, where many people live their working and social lives.

In the Investigatory Powers Act 2016 (IPA 2016) and the Digital Economy Act 2017, the government has taken enormous powers in the name of tackling ‘extremism’ (which can mean anything the government does not like). With rather less resources, the National Cyber Crime Unit (NCCU) seeks to tackle online crime. But nothing has yet

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
LexisNexis Legal Awards 2026—the winners!
The winners of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2026 have now been announced, marking another outstanding celebration of excellence, innovation, and impact across the legal profession
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll