header-logo header-logo

Modern protection

30 April 2009 / Peter Causton
Issue: 7367 / Categories: Features , Profession , Insurance / reinsurance , Technology
printer mail-detail

Peter Causton examines new types of claims in the modern world

When people refer to a professional indemnity claim, they are usually thinking about a claim against a traditional type of professional, such as a solicitor, surveyor or accountant, who normally carries compulsory insurance.

However, we are seeing an increase in technological convergence, whereby computing, media and communication networks are interlinked. Increasingly, business itself is being conducted in digital media spaces across a network of interconnecting devices. This is affecting traditional professional service sectors as well, with IT rapidly affecting their method of provision.

However, despite the expansion of media and IT businesses in the UK they are often the last to see the need for professional indemnity insurance. Contracting parties are increasingly demanding insurance cover as part of the contractual negotiations, but it is not compulsory. Cover can be obtained for:

      
      ●     technology and telecoms companies;

      
      ●     broadcasters and publishers; and

      
      ●     direct marketing companies.

Media and technology professionals need to consider obtaining insurance if they are to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll