header-logo header-logo

New GHRs rejected

06 August 2014
Issue: 7617 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Lord Dyson sends CJC costs committee back to drawing board

Lord Dyson, Master of the Rolls, has rejected recommendations for new guideline hourly rates (GHRs) due to a lack of supporting evidence.

The recommendations are the result of 12 months’ consultation with the profession by the Civil Justice Council’s costs committee. The rates provide a guideline to judges of market rates for legal work.

However, Lord Dyson did accept the committee’s recommendations that the fees of costs lawyers and CILEx members and fellows should be upgraded to similar levels to those of solicitors.

Lord Dyson said: “A relatively small non-randomised survey cannot be a secure basis for determining what it costs solicitors to run their practices. This shortcoming in the evidence is fundamental.”

He acknowledged that the committee could not compel the profession to respond to its survey and so got a poor response, and that the Jackson reforms make the future difficult to predict as the reforms may drive the GHRs down further.

Consequently, there will be no change to the existing rates. Lord Dyson has sent the committee back to the drawing board but recommended they ask the Law Society and the government to provide resources for proper research to be carried out.

NLJ consultant editor David Greene, a partner at Edwin Coe and a member of the costs committee, says: “The conclusions of the Master of the Rolls are a sensible approach to what would have been some dramatic changes.

“The profession may well have been surprised that rates last reviewed over four years ago were being reduced. The time has not however been wasted. Many lessons have been learned and hopefully we can move on to a proper evidence based survey.”

Issue: 7617 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll