header-logo header-logo

No extension for Solicitors Indemnity Fund cover

25 March 2016
Issue: 7692 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The Law Society has expressed disappointment at a decision by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) to reject calls to extend Solicitors Indemnity Fund (SIF) cover by a further three years to 2023.

SIF closed in 2000. Currently, however, any firm that has closed since September 2000 without a successor can resort to the SIF for any claim made after the six-year run-off period. This arrangement is due to end in 2020, and the SRA Board has now decided not to grant an extension.

Paul Philip, SRA Chief Executive, says: “We consulted on reducing the amount of run-off cover because many see it as a barrier to closing down, and that’s still something we want to look at. Extending cover through SIF would be contrary to that aim and would be suggesting that six years run-off cover is not enough.”

However, Law Society chief executive Catherine Dixon says: “The solicitor profession has funded protection for clients and for solicitors retiring from or leaving the profession via the SIF which pays compensation for claims brought after six years (which is the standard protection in solicitors’ insurance policies).

“We are disappointed that the SRA has decided not to extend SIF beyond 2020 even though solicitors had in the past been promised that this protection would continue. Without SIF, insurance will only cover clients and their solicitors for claims made within the insurance policy period, regardless of when the wrongful act gave rise to the claim took place.

“This means that claims brought outside the standard six year policy period will not be insured. This places those solicitors who are seeking to leave or who have left the profession at risk of liability and means that clients may not receive compensation in the event of negligence for claims are made after six years. The Law Society of England and Wales is considering whether there are any viability of options to replace the SIF beyond 2020.”

Issue: 7692 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll