header-logo header-logo

25 March 2016
Issue: 7692 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

No extension for Solicitors Indemnity Fund cover

The Law Society has expressed disappointment at a decision by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) to reject calls to extend Solicitors Indemnity Fund (SIF) cover by a further three years to 2023.

SIF closed in 2000. Currently, however, any firm that has closed since September 2000 without a successor can resort to the SIF for any claim made after the six-year run-off period. This arrangement is due to end in 2020, and the SRA Board has now decided not to grant an extension.

Paul Philip, SRA Chief Executive, says: “We consulted on reducing the amount of run-off cover because many see it as a barrier to closing down, and that’s still something we want to look at. Extending cover through SIF would be contrary to that aim and would be suggesting that six years run-off cover is not enough.”

However, Law Society chief executive Catherine Dixon says: “The solicitor profession has funded protection for clients and for solicitors retiring from or leaving the profession via the SIF which pays compensation for claims brought after six years (which is the standard protection in solicitors’ insurance policies).

“We are disappointed that the SRA has decided not to extend SIF beyond 2020 even though solicitors had in the past been promised that this protection would continue. Without SIF, insurance will only cover clients and their solicitors for claims made within the insurance policy period, regardless of when the wrongful act gave rise to the claim took place.

“This means that claims brought outside the standard six year policy period will not be insured. This places those solicitors who are seeking to leave or who have left the profession at risk of liability and means that clients may not receive compensation in the event of negligence for claims are made after six years. The Law Society of England and Wales is considering whether there are any viability of options to replace the SIF beyond 2020.”

Issue: 7692 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
The legal profession’s claim to be a ‘guardian of fairness’ is under scrutiny after stark findings on gender imbalance and opaque progression. Writing in NLJ this week, Joshua Purser of No5 Barristers’ Chambers and Govindi Deerasinghe of Global 50/50 warn that leadership remains dominated by a narrow elite, with men holding 71% of top court roles
A legal challenge to police disclosure rules has failed, reinforcing a push for transparency in policing. In NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth examines a case where the Metropolitan Police required officers to declare membership of groups like the Freemasons
Bereavement leave is undergoing a quiet but profound transformation. Writing in NLJ this week, Robert Hargreaves of York St John University explains how the Employment Rights Act 2025 introduces a day-one right to leave for a wider range of losses, alongside new provisions for pregnancy loss and bereaved partners
Courts are beginning to grapple with whether AI-generated material is legally privileged—and the answers are mixed. In this week's issue of NLJ, Stacie Bourton, Tom Whittaker & Beata Kolodziej of Burges Salmon examine US rulings showing how easily privilege can be lost
New guidance seeks to bring order to the growing use of artificial intelligence (AI) in expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Minesh Tanna and David Bridge of Simmons & Simmons set out a framework stressing ‘transparency’, ‘explainability’ and ‘reliability’
back-to-top-scroll