header-logo header-logo

No extension for Solicitors Indemnity Fund cover

25 March 2016
Issue: 7692 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The Law Society has expressed disappointment at a decision by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) to reject calls to extend Solicitors Indemnity Fund (SIF) cover by a further three years to 2023.

SIF closed in 2000. Currently, however, any firm that has closed since September 2000 without a successor can resort to the SIF for any claim made after the six-year run-off period. This arrangement is due to end in 2020, and the SRA Board has now decided not to grant an extension.

Paul Philip, SRA Chief Executive, says: “We consulted on reducing the amount of run-off cover because many see it as a barrier to closing down, and that’s still something we want to look at. Extending cover through SIF would be contrary to that aim and would be suggesting that six years run-off cover is not enough.”

However, Law Society chief executive Catherine Dixon says: “The solicitor profession has funded protection for clients and for solicitors retiring from or leaving the profession via the SIF which pays compensation for claims brought after six years (which is the standard protection in solicitors’ insurance policies).

“We are disappointed that the SRA has decided not to extend SIF beyond 2020 even though solicitors had in the past been promised that this protection would continue. Without SIF, insurance will only cover clients and their solicitors for claims made within the insurance policy period, regardless of when the wrongful act gave rise to the claim took place.

“This means that claims brought outside the standard six year policy period will not be insured. This places those solicitors who are seeking to leave or who have left the profession at risk of liability and means that clients may not receive compensation in the event of negligence for claims are made after six years. The Law Society of England and Wales is considering whether there are any viability of options to replace the SIF beyond 2020.”

Issue: 7692 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
Is a suspect’s state of mind a ‘fact’ capable of triggering adverse inferences? Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Smith of Corker Binning examines how R v Leslie reshapes the debate
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
back-to-top-scroll