header-logo header-logo

No more them & us

14 October 2011 / Sarah Johnson
Issue: 7485 / Categories: Features , Tribunals , Terms&conditions , Employment
printer mail-detail
83815757_4

Enhanced equality for agency workers provides a headache for employers, warns Sarah Johnson

“Getting a temp in” has been a popular solution to staffing issues, with around 1.3 million agency workers in the UK labour market. The attraction of using temps declined this month when the Agency Workers Regulations 2010 (SI 2010/93) (the regulations) came into force on 1 October. They aim to improve the position of many temps working alongside permanent staff who enjoy substantially better terms. The Department for Business Innovation and Skills has provided helpful guidance on the regulations (see www.bis.gov.uk).

Who is covered?

The regulations apply to agency workers who are supplied by a temporary work agency to work temporarily for and under the supervision and direction of a hirer, and have either an employment contract with the agency or another contract to perform work or services personally.

Agencies could include traditional employment businesses or intermediaries, such as umbrella companies, involved in the supply of the agency worker. Examples of arrangements

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll