header-logo header-logo

On top of TUPE

04 February 2022 / John McMullen
Issue: 7965 / Categories: Features , Employment , TUPE
printer mail-detail
71054
John McMullen presents a round-up of the latest cases on TUPE transfers
  • Transfer of benefits: income protection payments.
  • Incorporated employment terms: custom and practice.
  • Fiduciary duties and pre-transfer extraordinary employee payments.
  • Collective redundancy consultations.
  • Fixed-term framework agreements and transfer of undertakings: an EU perspective.

Litigation over TUPE transfers has quietened recently, but there are nuggets still to be found. In this article, we analyse recent developments.

Transfer of benefits

In Amdocs Systems Group Ltd v Langton UKEAT/0093/20/AT, it has been held that TUPE protected a transferring employee’s sickness benefits in full as the old employer had not informed the employee these could be changed under the insurance policy concerned. The employee’s summary of benefits set out the terms of a long-term sickness scheme, and the level of income protection payments (IPP) payable under it. These included reference to an ‘escalator’ of 5% per annum which would apply after the first 52 weeks.

In 2009, the claimant began a period of long-term sickness absence and then began to receive IPP. This was

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Red Lion Chambers—Maurice MacSweeney

Red Lion Chambers—Maurice MacSweeney

Set creates new client and business development role amid growth

Kingsley Napley—Tim Lowles

Kingsley Napley—Tim Lowles

Sports disputes practice launchedwith partner appointment

mfg Solicitors—Tom Evans

mfg Solicitors—Tom Evans

Tax and succession planning offering expands with returning partner

NEWS
The rank of King’s Counsel (KC) has been awarded to 96 barristers, and no solicitors, in the latest silk round
Neurotechnology is poised to transform contract law—and unsettle it. Writing in NLJ this week, Harry Lambert, barrister at Outer Temple Chambers and founder of the Centre for Neurotechnology & Law, and Dr Michelle Sharpe, barrister at the Victorian Bar, explore how brain–computer interfaces could both prove and undermine consent
Comparators remain the fault line of discrimination law. In this week's NLJ, Anjali Malik, partner at Bellevue Law, and Mukhtiar Singh, barrister at Doughty Street Chambers, review a bumper year of appellate guidance clarifying how tribunals should approach ‘actual’ and ‘evidential’ comparators. A new six-stage framework stresses a simple starting point: identify the treatment first
In cross-border divorces, domicile can decide everything. In NLJ this week, Jennifer Headon, legal director and head of international family, Isobel Inkley, solicitor, and Fiona Collins, trainee solicitor, all at Birketts LLP, unpack a Court of Appeal ruling that re-centres nuance in jurisdiction disputes. The court held that once a domicile of choice is established, the burden lies on the party asserting its loss
Can a chief constable be held responsible for disobedient officers? Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth, professor of public law at De Montfort University, examines a Court of Appeal ruling that answers firmly: yes
back-to-top-scroll