header-logo header-logo

04 February 2022 / John McMullen
Issue: 7965 / Categories: Features , Employment , TUPE
printer mail-detail

On top of TUPE

71054
John McMullen presents a round-up of the latest cases on TUPE transfers
  • Transfer of benefits: income protection payments.
  • Incorporated employment terms: custom and practice.
  • Fiduciary duties and pre-transfer extraordinary employee payments.
  • Collective redundancy consultations.
  • Fixed-term framework agreements and transfer of undertakings: an EU perspective.

Litigation over TUPE transfers has quietened recently, but there are nuggets still to be found. In this article, we analyse recent developments.

Transfer of benefits

In Amdocs Systems Group Ltd v Langton UKEAT/0093/20/AT, it has been held that TUPE protected a transferring employee’s sickness benefits in full as the old employer had not informed the employee these could be changed under the insurance policy concerned. The employee’s summary of benefits set out the terms of a long-term sickness scheme, and the level of income protection payments (IPP) payable under it. These included reference to an ‘escalator’ of 5% per annum which would apply after the first 52 weeks.

In 2009, the claimant began a period of long-term sickness absence and then began to receive IPP. This was

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll