header-logo header-logo

'One court, one judiciary' to become a reality?

05 July 2018
Issue: 7800 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

The idea of a ‘one-stop shop’ for dispute resolution is an increasingly attainable prize as the modernisation of the courts gets underway, according to a QC.

Writing in this week’s NLJ, Steven Gasztowicz QC, Cornerstone Barristers, recalls how he proposed merging all the civil courts into ‘one court’ 30 years ago as a junior barrister, in a 'no doubt rather naive' paper that he sent to the then Leader of his circuit, Igor Judge QC. Judge agreed with the proposals but thought them too big a change to be taken seriously by the powers that be.

However, the Chancellor of the High Court, Sir Geoffrey Vos, is now advocating alterations that go further, incorporating tribunals as well. The former Lord Chief Justice, Lord Thomas with the Senior President of Tribunals issued a joint statement in favour of ‘one judiciary’ in 2016. There is increasing closeness between courts and tribunals, for example, for the past decade all High Court and circuit judges have also been judges of the First-tier Tribunal and Upper Tribunal; and a pilot scheme began in 2017 where judges were ‘double-hatted’ to sit as county court judges and tribunal judges at the same time.

The courts have also become closer—in 2014, the individual county courts were replaced by a single county court operating from different locations.

Gasztowicz writes: ‘It remains to be seen to what extent a fundamental alignment of the different courts and tribunals, their judiciary and jurisdictions, will come about and when.

‘There are, as I have noted, a lot of changes already in the wind with which to contend. However, once these “modernisation” changes have taken effect at least, it would not be surprising if, with the force of the current Chancellor behind it, as well as the thinking of the last Lord Chief Justice, and the Senior President of Tribunals, such a transformation moves forward.’

Issue: 7800 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll