header-logo header-logo

'One court, one judiciary' to become a reality?

05 July 2018
Issue: 7800 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

The idea of a ‘one-stop shop’ for dispute resolution is an increasingly attainable prize as the modernisation of the courts gets underway, according to a QC.

Writing in this week’s NLJ, Steven Gasztowicz QC, Cornerstone Barristers, recalls how he proposed merging all the civil courts into ‘one court’ 30 years ago as a junior barrister, in a 'no doubt rather naive' paper that he sent to the then Leader of his circuit, Igor Judge QC. Judge agreed with the proposals but thought them too big a change to be taken seriously by the powers that be.

However, the Chancellor of the High Court, Sir Geoffrey Vos, is now advocating alterations that go further, incorporating tribunals as well. The former Lord Chief Justice, Lord Thomas with the Senior President of Tribunals issued a joint statement in favour of ‘one judiciary’ in 2016. There is increasing closeness between courts and tribunals, for example, for the past decade all High Court and circuit judges have also been judges of the First-tier Tribunal and Upper Tribunal; and a pilot scheme began in 2017 where judges were ‘double-hatted’ to sit as county court judges and tribunal judges at the same time.

The courts have also become closer—in 2014, the individual county courts were replaced by a single county court operating from different locations.

Gasztowicz writes: ‘It remains to be seen to what extent a fundamental alignment of the different courts and tribunals, their judiciary and jurisdictions, will come about and when.

‘There are, as I have noted, a lot of changes already in the wind with which to contend. However, once these “modernisation” changes have taken effect at least, it would not be surprising if, with the force of the current Chancellor behind it, as well as the thinking of the last Lord Chief Justice, and the Senior President of Tribunals, such a transformation moves forward.’

Issue: 7800 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll