header-logo header-logo

16 January 2015
Issue: 7636 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Part 36 gets a makeover

The new look Part 36, due to come into force on 6 April, addresses some of the most pressing problems encountered in practice, a QC has said.

Ed Pepperall QC, a commercial silk at St Philips Chambers and a member of the Civil Procedure Rule Committee (CPRC) which drew up the new Part 36, provides “an insider’s guide” to the new rules, in NLJ this week.

Part 36 is used in virtually every case, from modest-value fast-track claims to billion-pound litigation, he writes, and it is important “that its sophisticated system of carrots and sticks is fit for purpose”.

The new rules offer greater clarity on split trials and the extent to which a judge may be told about an offer. Litigators will be able to make time-limited offers, and offers are less likely to be discounted for technical reasons.

Another change is that notice to make an offer more advantageous will be treated as the making of a new offer on the improved terms rather than the withdrawal of the original offer.

The new Part 36 even takes account of the notorious Mitchell case—a new rule provides that litigants whose budget has been limited to court fees can nevertheless recover 50% of their costs assessed without reference to the limitation if they make an effective Part 36 offer.

Pepperall writes: “This solution is intended to ensure that the miscreant is still punished for the default that led to the sanction while the innocent party does not have a blank cheque to turn down reasonable settlement offers.”

Issue: 7636 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Firm strengthens global fund finance practice with London partner hire.

DWF—Stephen Webb

DWF—Stephen Webb

Partner and head of national planning team appointed

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

Corporate team expands in Birmingham with partner hire

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll