header-logo header-logo

16 January 2015
Issue: 7636 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Part 36 gets a makeover

The new look Part 36, due to come into force on 6 April, addresses some of the most pressing problems encountered in practice, a QC has said.

Ed Pepperall QC, a commercial silk at St Philips Chambers and a member of the Civil Procedure Rule Committee (CPRC) which drew up the new Part 36, provides “an insider’s guide” to the new rules, in NLJ this week.

Part 36 is used in virtually every case, from modest-value fast-track claims to billion-pound litigation, he writes, and it is important “that its sophisticated system of carrots and sticks is fit for purpose”.

The new rules offer greater clarity on split trials and the extent to which a judge may be told about an offer. Litigators will be able to make time-limited offers, and offers are less likely to be discounted for technical reasons.

Another change is that notice to make an offer more advantageous will be treated as the making of a new offer on the improved terms rather than the withdrawal of the original offer.

The new Part 36 even takes account of the notorious Mitchell case—a new rule provides that litigants whose budget has been limited to court fees can nevertheless recover 50% of their costs assessed without reference to the limitation if they make an effective Part 36 offer.

Pepperall writes: “This solution is intended to ensure that the miscreant is still punished for the default that led to the sanction while the innocent party does not have a blank cheque to turn down reasonable settlement offers.”

Issue: 7636 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll