header-logo header-logo

Part 36 gets a makeover

16 January 2015
Issue: 7636 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The new look Part 36, due to come into force on 6 April, addresses some of the most pressing problems encountered in practice, a QC has said.

Ed Pepperall QC, a commercial silk at St Philips Chambers and a member of the Civil Procedure Rule Committee (CPRC) which drew up the new Part 36, provides “an insider’s guide” to the new rules, in NLJ this week.

Part 36 is used in virtually every case, from modest-value fast-track claims to billion-pound litigation, he writes, and it is important “that its sophisticated system of carrots and sticks is fit for purpose”.

The new rules offer greater clarity on split trials and the extent to which a judge may be told about an offer. Litigators will be able to make time-limited offers, and offers are less likely to be discounted for technical reasons.

Another change is that notice to make an offer more advantageous will be treated as the making of a new offer on the improved terms rather than the withdrawal of the original offer.

The new Part 36 even takes account of the notorious Mitchell case—a new rule provides that litigants whose budget has been limited to court fees can nevertheless recover 50% of their costs assessed without reference to the limitation if they make an effective Part 36 offer.

Pepperall writes: “This solution is intended to ensure that the miscreant is still punished for the default that led to the sanction while the innocent party does not have a blank cheque to turn down reasonable settlement offers.”

Issue: 7636 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll